Kaufman J, Skjoedt K, Salomonsen J
Basel Institute for Immunology, Switzerland.
Immunol Rev. 1990 Feb;113:83-117. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1990.tb00038.x.
There is very little known about the long-term evolution of the MHC and MHC-like molecules. This is because both the theory (the evolutionary questions and models) and the practice (the animals systems, functional assays and reagents to identify and characterize these molecules) have been difficult to develop. There is no molecular evidence yet to decide whether vertebrate immune systems (and particularly the MHC molecules) are evolutionarily related to invertebrate allorecognition systems, and the functional evidence can be interpreted either way. Even among the vertebrates, there is great heterogeneity in the quality and quantity of the immune response. The functional evidence for T-lymphocyte function in jawless and cartilagenous fish is poor, while the bony fish seem to have many characteristics of a mammalian immune system. The organization and sequence of fish Ig genes also indicate that important events in the evolution of the immune system and the MHC occurred in the fish, but thus far there is no molecular evidence for recognizable MHC-like molecules in any fish. There is clearly an MHC in amphibians and birds with many characteristics like the MHC of mammals (a single genetic region encoding polymorphic class I and class II molecules) and evidence for polymorphic class I and class II molecules in reptiles. However, many details differ from the mammals, and it is not clear whether these reflect historical accident or selection for different lifestyles or environment. For example, the adult frog Xenopus has a vigorous immune system with many similarities to mammals, a ubiquitous class I molecule, but a much wider class II tissue distribution than human, mouse and chicken. The Xenopus tadpole has a much more restricted immune response, no cell surface class I molecules and a mammalian class II distribution. The axolotl has a very poor immune response (as though there are no helper T cells), a wide class II distribution and, for most animals, no cell surface class I molecule. It would be enlightening to understand both the mechanisms for the regulation of the MHC molecules during ontogeny and the consequences for the immune system and survival of the animals. These animals also differ markedly in the level of MHC polymorphism. Another difference from mammals is the presence of previously uncharacterized molecules. In Xenopus and reptiles, there are two populations of class I alpha chain on the surface of erythrocytes, those in association with beta 2m and those in association with a disulfide-linked homodimer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
关于主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)及类MHC分子的长期进化,我们所知甚少。这是因为理论(进化问题与模型)和实践(动物系统、功能检测以及用于识别和表征这些分子的试剂)都难以发展。目前尚无分子证据来判定脊椎动物免疫系统(尤其是MHC分子)与无脊椎动物的异体识别系统在进化上是否相关,而功能证据也可以有两种解读方式。即便在脊椎动物中,免疫反应的质量和数量也存在极大的异质性。对于无颌类和软骨鱼类中T淋巴细胞功能的功能证据不足,而硬骨鱼似乎具有许多哺乳动物免疫系统的特征。鱼类免疫球蛋白(Ig)基因的组织和序列也表明,免疫系统和MHC进化过程中的重要事件发生在鱼类身上,但迄今为止,尚未在任何鱼类中找到可识别的类MHC分子的分子证据。两栖动物和鸟类显然拥有MHC,其具有许多与哺乳动物MHC相似的特征(一个编码多态性I类和II类分子的单一遗传区域),并且在爬行动物中也有I类和II类多态性分子的证据。然而,许多细节与哺乳动物不同,尚不清楚这些差异是反映了历史偶然,还是对不同生活方式或环境的选择。例如,成年非洲爪蟾有一个与哺乳动物有许多相似之处的活跃免疫系统,有一种普遍存在的I类分子,但其II类组织分布比人类、小鼠和鸡要广泛得多。非洲爪蟾蝌蚪的免疫反应则更为有限,没有细胞表面I类分子,且II类分子分布与哺乳动物相似。美西螈的免疫反应非常弱(似乎没有辅助性T细胞),II类分子分布广泛,并且对于大多数个体而言,没有细胞表面I类分子。了解个体发育过程中MHC分子的调控机制以及对动物免疫系统和生存的影响将会很有启发性。这些动物在MHC多态性水平上也存在显著差异。与哺乳动物的另一个不同之处在于存在先前未被表征的分子。在非洲爪蟾和爬行动物中,红细胞表面存在两类I类α链群体,一类与β2微球蛋白相关,另一类与二硫键连接的同型二聚体相关。(摘要截断于400字)