Mansour I, Bourin P, Rouger P, Doinel C
Institut National de Transfusion Sanguine, Laboratoire de Cytométrie en Flux, Paris, France.
J Immunol Methods. 1990 Feb 20;127(1):61-70. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(90)90341-r.
A technique is described for lymphocyte preparation which permits analyses by two-color immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. It consists, briefly, of the lysis of red blood cells and washing of white blood cells prior to labeling. We tested this technique with a large panel of monoclonal antibodies in mono- and dual immunofluorescence. By comparing these results to those obtained after density gradient separation, we found the following statistically significant differences: the count of the phenotype B1+ was higher after whole blood lysis preparation than after density gradient separation; whereas, the corresponding counts of OKT4+ and Leu-4-Leu-7+ phenotypes were lower. No difference was detected with OKT8+, Leu-4+, OKT8+Leu-4+, OKT8+Leu-4-, OKT8-Leu-4+, OKT8+Leu-7+, Leu-4+Leu-7+, Leu-4-Leu-11c+, OKT8+Leu-11c+ and OKT8+Leu-15+ phenotypes. We have studied the reproducibility of both methods and the correlation between them. The disparity of the lymphocyte subset count between these two methods, though statistically significant, was relatively weak and seems to be due to the density gradient separation. Since the preparation of lymphocytes using the density gradient method is time consuming, we propose whole blood lysis as an alternative lymphocyte separation method when assessing immune status in human disease by flow cytometry. It offers the following advantages: (i) it does not require additional steps, (ii) it permits two-color immunofluorescence through the labeling of white blood cells after washing, (iii) it is reliable, (iv) it is reproducible, and (v) it is helpful in studies of lymphopenia since it offers the possibility of lymphocyte enrichment.
本文描述了一种淋巴细胞制备技术,该技术可通过双色免疫荧光和流式细胞术进行分析。简而言之,它包括在标记之前裂解红细胞并洗涤白细胞。我们用一大组单克隆抗体对该技术进行了单免疫荧光和双免疫荧光测试。通过将这些结果与密度梯度分离后获得的结果进行比较,我们发现了以下具有统计学意义的差异:全血裂解制备后B1 +表型的计数高于密度梯度分离后;而OKT4 +和Leu-4-Leu-7 +表型的相应计数较低。OKT8 +、Leu-4 +、OKT8 + Leu-4 +、OKT8 + Leu-4 -、OKT8 - Leu-4 +、OKT8 + Leu-7 +、Leu-4 + Leu-7 +、Leu-4 - Leu-11c +、OKT8 + Leu-11c +和OKT8 + Leu-15 +表型未检测到差异。我们研究了这两种方法的可重复性以及它们之间的相关性。这两种方法之间淋巴细胞亚群计数的差异虽然具有统计学意义,但相对较小,似乎是由于密度梯度分离所致。由于使用密度梯度法制备淋巴细胞耗时,我们建议在通过流式细胞术评估人类疾病的免疫状态时,将全血裂解作为一种替代的淋巴细胞分离方法。它具有以下优点:(i)不需要额外的步骤,(ii)通过洗涤后标记白细胞允许进行双色免疫荧光,(iii)可靠,(iv)可重复,以及(v)有助于淋巴细胞减少症的研究,因为它提供了淋巴细胞富集的可能性。