Department of Periodontology and Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège Belgium.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Jun;15(3):412-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00374.x. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
The first objective of this study was to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the bone formation process, particularly the long-term behavior and three-dimensional volume stability of subsinusal bone regeneration, using titanium (Ti) or bovine hydroxyapatite (BHA) granules, in a rabbit model. The second objective was to evaluate the effect of the hydration of the BHA particles with a therapeutic concentration of doxycycline solution on the osteogenesis and biomaterial resorption.
Rabbits underwent a double sinus lift procedure using one of three materials: grade 1 porous Ti particles, BHA, or BHA hydrated with doxycycline solution (0.1mg/ml) (BHATTC). Animals were sacrificed after 1 week, 5 weeks, or 6 months. Samples were analyzed using µCT and nondecalcified histology.
The materials used in each of the three groups allowed an optimal bone formation; bone quantities and densities were not statistically different between the three groups. At 6 months, more stable three-dimensional volume stability was found with Ti and BHATTC (p=.0033). At 5 weeks and 6 months, bone to material contact corroborating osteoconduction was significantly higher with BHA and BHATTC than with Ti (p<.0001).
Even though the studied biomaterials displayed different architectures, they are relevant candidates for sinus lift bone augmentation prior to dental implants because they allow adequate three-dimensional stability and osteogenesis. However, to recommend the clinical use of Ti, both an observation on the drilling effects of Ti particles and clinical trials are needed.
本研究的首要目的是使用钛(Ti)或牛羟磷灰石(BHA)颗粒,在兔模型中定性和定量评估骨形成过程,特别是鼻窦底骨再生的长期行为和三维体积稳定性。第二个目的是评估含治疗浓度多西环素溶液的 BHA 颗粒水合作用对成骨和生物材料吸收的影响。
兔子接受了双窦提升手术,使用了三种材料中的一种:一级多孔 Ti 颗粒、BHA 或用 0.1mg/ml 多西环素溶液水合的 BHA(BHATTC)。动物在 1 周、5 周或 6 个月后被处死。使用 µCT 和非脱钙组织学分析样本。
三组中使用的材料都允许了最佳的骨形成;三组之间的骨量和密度没有统计学差异。在 6 个月时,Ti 和 BHATTC 显示出更稳定的三维体积稳定性(p=.0033)。在 5 周和 6 个月时,与 Ti 相比,BHA 和 BHATTC 的骨与材料接触更有利于骨传导(p<.0001)。
尽管研究的生物材料具有不同的结构,但它们是在植入物前进行鼻窦提升骨增量的候选材料,因为它们允许足够的三维稳定性和成骨作用。然而,为了推荐 Ti 的临床使用,需要观察 Ti 颗粒的钻孔效果并进行临床试验。