Tikuisis P, Gault K, Carrod G
Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, Downsview, Ontario, Canada.
Undersea Biomed Res. 1990 Mar;17(2):159-69.
The method of maximum likelihood has been applied to predict the incidence of bubbling in divers for both air and helium diving. Data were obtained from 108 air man-dives and 622 helium man-dives conducted experimentally in a hyperbaric chamber. Divers were monitored for bubbles using Doppler ultrasonics during the period from surfacing until approximately 2 h after surfacing. Bubble grades were recorded according to the K-M code, and the maximum value in the precordial region for each diver was used in the likelihood analysis. Prediction models were based on monoexponential gas kinetics using one and two parallel-compartment configurations. The model parameters were of three types: gas kinetics, gas potency, and compartment gain. When the potency of the gases was not distinguished, the risk criterion used was inherently based on the gas supersaturation ratio, otherwise it was based on the potential bubble volume. The two-compartment model gave a significantly better prediction than the one-compartment model only if the kinetics of nitrogen and helium were distinguished. A further significant improvement with the two-compartment model was obtained when the potency of the two gases was distinguished, thereby making the potential bubble volume criterion a better choice than the gas pressure criterion. The results suggest that when the method of maximum likelihood is applied for the prediction of the incidence of bubbling, more than one compartment should be used and if more than one is used consideration should be given to distinguishing the potencies of the inert gases.
最大似然法已被应用于预测空气潜水和氦气潜水时潜水员体内气泡形成的发生率。数据来自于在高压舱中进行的108次空气潜水和622次氦气潜水实验。潜水员在出水后直至出水后约2小时内,使用多普勒超声监测气泡。根据K-M编码记录气泡等级,并在似然分析中使用每个潜水员心前区的最大值。预测模型基于单指数气体动力学,采用单室和双室平行配置。模型参数有三种类型:气体动力学、气体效能和室增益。当不区分气体的效能时,所使用的风险标准本质上基于气体过饱和率,否则基于潜在气泡体积。只有区分了氮气和氦气的动力学时,双室模型的预测才比单室模型显著更好。当区分两种气体的效能时,双室模型有了进一步显著的改进,从而使潜在气泡体积标准比气体压力标准成为更好的选择。结果表明,当应用最大似然法预测气泡形成的发生率时,应使用不止一个室,如果使用多个室,则应考虑区分惰性气体的效能。