• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国医院不良事件报告系统的现状与问题

Status and problems of adverse event reporting systems in korean hospitals.

作者信息

Kim Jeongeun, Kim Sukwha, Jung Yoenyi, Kim Eun-Kyung

机构信息

College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Healthc Inform Res. 2010 Sep;16(3):166-76. doi: 10.4258/hir.2010.16.3.166. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

DOI:10.4258/hir.2010.16.3.166
PMID:21818436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3089854/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study identifies the current status and problems of adverse event reporting system in Korean hospitals. The data obtained from this study will be used to raise international awareness and enable collaborative researches on patient safety.

METHODS

We distributed the questionnaire developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), USA to the 265 risk managers of hospitals by e-mail. Seventy-two percent of the risk managers responded to the inquiry.

RESULTS

Eighty-five percent of the hospitals responded that they collect information regarding the event where harm has occurred or might have occurred to a patient. Seventy-five percent of the hospitals did not allow individuals to report occurrences without identifying themselves. Only 54% of the hospitals had an organized patient safety program that manages or coordinates all of the hospital's patient safety activities. The most frequent reason why errors were not reported was the fear of individuals being involved in the investigation and potential disadvantage resulting from it. Eighty-five percent of the hospitals produced reports of their adverse event data, but 68% of the hospitals did not distribute occurrence reports within the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of standardized reporting system, available information, procedures for protecting the reporting individuals, and mindlessness/indifference of the hospital employees are identified as the major problems. Therefore, it is crucial to address these problems to develop appropriate solutions, enable proactive involvement from the healthcare community, and change the overall patient safety culture, specifically protecting privacy, to increase the quality of service in the healthcare industry.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定韩国医院不良事件报告系统的现状和问题。本研究获得的数据将用于提高国际关注度,并促进关于患者安全的合作研究。

方法

我们通过电子邮件向265家医院的风险管理人员发放了由美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)编制的调查问卷。72%的风险管理人员回复了调查。

结果

85%的医院表示他们会收集有关患者已发生或可能发生伤害事件的信息。75%的医院不允许个人在不表明身份的情况下报告事件。只有54%的医院有一个有组织的患者安全计划来管理或协调医院所有的患者安全活动。未报告错误的最常见原因是担心个人卷入调查以及由此产生的潜在不利影响。85%的医院生成了不良事件数据报告,但68%的医院未在医院内部分发事件报告。

结论

缺乏标准化报告系统、可用信息、保护报告人的程序以及医院员工的疏忽/冷漠被确定为主要问题。因此,解决这些问题对于制定适当的解决方案、促使医疗界积极参与以及改变整体患者安全文化(特别是保护隐私)以提高医疗行业的服务质量至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97e/3089854/abade522cb1a/hir-16-166-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97e/3089854/9e9c53f5edb3/hir-16-166-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97e/3089854/0eb746bb3519/hir-16-166-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97e/3089854/c47cda8f861f/hir-16-166-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97e/3089854/abade522cb1a/hir-16-166-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97e/3089854/9e9c53f5edb3/hir-16-166-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97e/3089854/0eb746bb3519/hir-16-166-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97e/3089854/c47cda8f861f/hir-16-166-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97e/3089854/abade522cb1a/hir-16-166-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Status and problems of adverse event reporting systems in korean hospitals.韩国医院不良事件报告系统的现状与问题
Healthc Inform Res. 2010 Sep;16(3):166-76. doi: 10.4258/hir.2010.16.3.166. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Adverse-event-reporting practices by US hospitals: results of a national survey.美国医院的不良事件报告做法:一项全国性调查的结果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):416-23. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024638.
4
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
5
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
6
The long road to patient safety: a status report on patient safety systems.通往患者安全的漫长之路:患者安全系统现状报告
JAMA. 2005 Dec 14;294(22):2858-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.22.2858.
7
Results of a survey on medical error reporting systems in Korean hospitals.韩国医院医疗差错报告系统的调查结果。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Feb;75(2):148-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.005. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Development, testing, and findings of a pediatric-focused trigger tool to identify medication-related harm in US children's hospitals.一种以儿科为重点的触发工具在美国儿童医院中识别与药物相关伤害的开发、测试及结果
Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):e927-35. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1779.
10
How event reporting by US hospitals has changed from 2005 to 2009.美国医院的不良事件报告自 2005 年至 2009 年发生了怎样的变化。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan;21(1):70-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000114. Epub 2011 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting of adverse events and the fundamental tasks of managers-A qualitative interview study.不良事件报告与管理者的基本任务:一项定性访谈研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Sep;10(9):6291-6299. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1875. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
2
Effectiveness and Sustainability of Education about Incident Reporting at a University Hospital in Japan.日本某大学医院事件报告教育的有效性与可持续性
Healthc Inform Res. 2014 Jul;20(3):209-15. doi: 10.4258/hir.2014.20.3.209. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
3
Role of computerized physician order entry usability in the reduction of prescribing errors.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals' intention to use an adverse event reporting system.测试用于评估医疗保健专业人员使用不良事件报告系统意愿的技术接受模型。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Apr;20(2):123-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm074. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
2
Adverse event reporting: lessons learned from 4 years of Florida office data.不良事件报告:从佛罗里达办公室四年的数据中吸取的教训。
Dermatol Surg. 2005 Sep;31(9 Pt 1):1079-92; discussion 1093.
3
The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events.
计算机化医嘱录入的可用性在减少处方错误中的作用。
Healthc Inform Res. 2013 Jun;19(2):93-101. doi: 10.4258/hir.2013.19.2.93. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
4
Barriers to the operation of patient safety incident reporting systems in korean general hospitals.韩国综合医院患者安全事件报告系统的运行障碍
Healthc Inform Res. 2012 Dec;18(4):279-86. doi: 10.4258/hir.2012.18.4.279. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
联合委员会国际医疗卫生机构认证联合委员会患者安全事件分类法:一种针对未遂失误和不良事件的标准化术语及分类架构。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Apr;17(2):95-105. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi021. Epub 2005 Feb 21.
4
Voluntary anonymous reporting of medical errors for neonatal intensive care.新生儿重症监护中医疗差错的自愿匿名报告。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1609-18. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1609.
5
Improving safety with information technology.利用信息技术提高安全性。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2526-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa020847.
6
Systematic root cause analysis of adverse drug events in a tertiary referral hospital.三级转诊医院药品不良事件的系统根本原因分析
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Oct;26(10):563-75. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26048-3.
7
Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: an empirical study.未报告不良事件的原因:一项实证研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Feb;5(1):13-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00147.x.