Newell Stephanie, Jordan Zoe
1 The Joanna Briggs Institute, School of Translational Health Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the eligible evidence of patients' experience of engaging and interacting with nurses, in the medical-surgical ward setting.This review will consider the following questions:
Communication is a way in which humans make sense of the world around them. Communication takes place as an interactive two-way process or interaction, involving two or more people and can occur by nonverbal, verbal, face-to-face or non-face-to-face methods. Effective communication is described to occur when the sender of a message sends their message in a way that conveys the intent of their message and then is understood by the receiver of the message. As a result of the communication from both the sender and the receiver of the message a shared meaning is created between both parties.Communication can therefore be viewed as a reciprocal process. In the health care literature the terms communication and interaction are used interchangeably.Communication failures between clinicians are the most common primary cause of errors and adverse events in health care. Communication is a significant factor in patient satisfaction and complaints about care. Communication plays an integral role in service quality in all service professions including health care professions.Within healthcare, quality care has been defined by the Institute of Medicine as 'care that is safe, effective, timely, efficient, equitable and patient-centred'. Patient-centered care is defined as 'care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient's values guide all clinical decisions. Patient centered-care encompasses the 'individual experiences of a patient, the clinical service, the organizational and the regulatory levels of health care'. At the individual patient level, patient-centered care is care that is 'provided in a respectful manner, assures open and ongoing sharing of useful information in an ongoing manner and supports and encourages the participation of patients and their families'. Healthcare organizations that are patient-centered engage patients as partners and hold human interactions as a pillar of their service.The deepening evidence base for principles and practice of patient-centered care has resulted in increasing recognition of, and greater focus on, the engagement of patients, and the value and benefit of patient engagement. Contemporary healthcare policy across the globe increasingly supports the engagement of patients as partners in all aspects of their own health care and also in systemic quality improvement. In 2005, the World Health Organization's (WHO) World Alliance for Patient Safety established the Patients for Patient Safety program, to improve patient safety globally in collaboration with patient advocates across the world. As a global initiative, Patients for Patient Safety 'believes that safety will be improved if patients are placed at the center of care and included as full partners'.In 2011 the United States of America Department of Health and Human Services announced its commitment of one billion US dollars of federal funding under The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 2010 and launched the Partnership for Patients initiative. The Partnership for Patients public-private consortium, which focuses on patient safety improvements and draws membership from federal government agencies and over 8000 health care providing organizations and individuals, views patients 'as essential partners in improving safety and quality' and 'their participation as active members of their own healthcare team is an essential component of making healthcare safer and reducing readmission'.In Australia, as part of national health care reforms to improve access to care, the efficiency of care and public transparency of the performance and funding of health services, the Australian Health Ministers endorsed the 10 National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards (NSQHSS) in 2011 and the Australian Safety and Quality Goals for Health Care (The Goals) in 2012. The NSQHSS focus on partnerships with health consumers in their own care and treatment and also in health service planning, the design of care and service monitoring and evaluation. Standard 1 - Governance for Safety and Quality, and Standard 2 - Partnering with Consumers, are required to be integrated within all of the other eight Standards.With patient safety and quality being core to the delivery of care the Safety of Care, Appropriateness of Care and Partnering with Consumers goals have been identified as the three areas that will make up the goals over the next five years until 2017. The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, in providing further justification for the focus on these three areas, states:The third priority area of The Goals, Partnering with Consumers, reflects patient-centered care practice by ensuring 'that there are effective partnerships between consumers and healthcare providers and organizations at all levels of healthcare provision, planning and evaluation'. Specifically, 'Consumers and healthcare providers understand each other when communicating about care and treatment and health care organizations are health literate organizations''.As healthcare focuses on providing services that are patient-centered and methods to ensure this occurs, patients' voice and experience of health care provision is increasingly being sought from an organizational quality improvement perspective. Patients are being surveyed on their healthcare experience across interpersonal areas such as being provided the opportunity by their health professional to ask questions, the level of involvement in their own care and whether they were shown courtesy, treated with respect and listened to carefully by their health professional.Surveys of patients' satisfaction with their care are now being superseded by surveys of patient experiences of care. However, current methods used to collect and use information from patients about their care is often retrospective, provides inadequate real time data and is not effective in creating action to produce change at the individual patient level. Methods which focus on including the patient and their information in real-time are considered by many to be crucial to the advancement of improved health outcomes and the reduced costs that are required of health care to be sustainable. One such method is patient-centered communication.The nurse-patient interaction is a core component of nursing science and high quality nursing care. Fleisher et al. contend that 'the main intention of communication and interaction, in the health setting, is to influence the patient's health status or state of well-being'. As a profession, nursing predominately requires communicating with, and relating to, patients at the individual level. In the hospital setting nurses undertake many of their patient related duties in a face-to-face manner with the patient at the bedside and these moments can facilitate effective interaction to occur between the nurse and the patient, which is patient-centered. McCabe et al. state that patient-centered communication as "defined by Langewitz et al. as 'communication that invites and encourages the patient to participate and negotiate in decision-making regarding their own care'.''However, qualitative studies by McCabe and Wellard et al, highlighted that nurses interact with patients only when performing administrative or functional activities and nursing 'practice was predominately task-orientated'. The outcome of these studies are supported by Maurer et al. in their report on the tools and strategies available to support patient and family engagement in the hospital setting. Maurer et al. identified that current strategies 'are not attuned to patient and family member experiences of hospitalization' and that most tools and strategies were 'more reflective of health professional and hospital views and the organization of their work'. The report identified a gap in the initiation of engagement, which is not driven by the patients and families' needs and preferences as they occur but by the 'opportunities that the hospital makes available'.McCabe et al. also argue that nurses' attending behavior, that is their 'accessibility and readiness to listen to patients through the use of non-verbal communication' requires that they have the underpinning elements of 'genuineness, warmth and empathy' all of which are components of patient-centered communication. McCabe et al. observed that 'that nurses do not always communicate in a patient-centered way'.According to Fleischer et al. 'The listening behavior in the way of listening and asking actually is the beginning of the nurse-patient communication relationship' McCabe et al. state that the lack of recognition and support by healthcare organizations of the connection and subsequent importance of patient-centered communication in the provision of high quality care has promulgated a culture averse to patient centered communication and is a significant factor in reducing the value that nurses place on providing patient-centered communication to patients.It is apparent that tensions exist between service quality and patient-centered care principles and practice. The impact of this tension on care and the patient as an individual is reflected in the literature. McCabe et al. claim that the use of non-patient-centered types of communication can negatively affect a patient's sense of well-being and security. Horvey et al. detail patient and family member experiences of not being listened to by their health care providers and describe the resulting consequences to be as severe as the death of the patient during their hospital stay. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
综述问题/目标:本系统综述的目的是综合在医疗外科病房环境中患者与护士接触和互动体验的合格证据。本综述将考虑以下问题:
沟通是人类理解周围世界的一种方式。沟通是一个互动的双向过程或互动,涉及两个或更多人,可以通过非语言、语言、面对面或非面对面的方式进行。当信息发送者以传达其信息意图的方式发送信息,然后被信息接收者理解时,就发生了有效的沟通。由于信息发送者和接收者的沟通,双方之间产生了共同的意义。因此,沟通可以被视为一个相互的过程。在医疗保健文献中,沟通和互动这两个术语可以互换使用。临床医生之间的沟通失败是医疗保健中错误和不良事件最常见的主要原因。沟通是患者满意度和护理投诉的一个重要因素。沟通在包括医疗保健行业在内的所有服务行业的服务质量中都起着不可或缺的作用。在医疗保健领域,医学研究所将优质护理定义为“安全、有效、及时、高效、公平且以患者为中心的护理”。以患者为中心的护理被定义为“尊重并响应个体患者的偏好、需求和价值观,并确保患者的价值观指导所有临床决策的护理”。以患者为中心的护理涵盖了“患者的个人经历、临床服务、医疗保健的组织和监管层面”。在个体患者层面,以患者为中心的护理是以“尊重的方式提供,确保持续开放地分享有用信息,并支持和鼓励患者及其家属参与”的护理。以患者为中心的医疗保健组织将患者视为合作伙伴,并将人际互动作为其服务的支柱。以患者为中心的护理原则和实践的证据基础不断深化,导致人们对患者参与的认识不断提高,并更加关注患者参与以及患者参与所带来的价值和益处。全球范围内的当代医疗保健政策越来越支持患者作为合作伙伴参与其自身医疗保健的各个方面以及系统质量改进。2005年,世界卫生组织(WHO)的世界患者安全联盟设立了患者参与患者安全计划,以与世界各地的患者倡导者合作,在全球范围内提高患者安全。作为一项全球倡议,患者参与患者安全“相信,如果将患者置于护理中心并将其作为完全的合作伙伴纳入,安全将会得到改善”。2011年,美国卫生与公众服务部宣布根据2010年《患者保护与平价医疗法案》承诺提供10亿美元的联邦资金,并发起了患者合作伙伴计划。患者合作伙伴公私合营财团专注于改善患者安全,其成员包括联邦政府机构以及8000多家医疗保健提供组织和个人,该财团将患者视为“改善安全和质量的重要合作伙伴”,并认为“他们作为自己医疗团队的积极成员的参与是使医疗保健更安全并减少再入院的重要组成部分”。在澳大利亚,作为改善医疗服务可及性、医疗效率以及医疗服务绩效和资金的公共透明度的国家医疗保健改革的一部分,澳大利亚卫生部长在2011年批准了10项国家患者安全与质量卫生服务标准(NSQHSS),并在2012年批准了澳大利亚医疗保健安全与质量目标(目标)。NSQHSS注重在患者自身的护理和治疗以及医疗服务规划、护理设计和服务监测与评估方面与医疗消费者建立伙伴关系。标准1——安全与质量治理,以及标准2——与消费者合作,要求融入其他八项标准之中。由于患者安全和质量是护理提供的核心,护理安全、护理适宜性和与消费者合作目标已被确定为直至2017年的未来五年内构成目标的三个领域。澳大利亚医疗保健安全与质量委员会在为关注这三个领域提供进一步理由时指出:目标的第三个优先领域,与消费者合作,通过确保“在医疗保健提供、规划和评估的各个层面,消费者与医疗保健提供者及组织之间存在有效的伙伴关系”,反映了以患者为中心的护理实践。具体而言,“消费者和医疗保健提供者在就护理和治疗进行沟通时相互理解,并且医疗保健组织是具备健康素养的组织”。随着医疗保健专注于提供以患者为中心的服务以及确保实现这一目标的方法,从组织质量改进的角度来看,越来越多地寻求患者对医疗保健提供的看法和体验。正在就患者在人际方面的医疗保健体验进行调查,例如他们的健康专业人员是否为他们提供了提问的机会、他们在自身护理中的参与程度,以及他们的健康专业人员是否对他们有礼貌、尊重他们并认真倾听他们的意见。现在,对患者护理满意度的调查正被对患者护理体验的调查所取代。然而,目前用于收集和使用患者关于其护理信息的方法通常是回顾性的,提供的实时数据不足,并且在促使采取行动以在个体患者层面产生改变方面效果不佳。许多人认为,专注于实时纳入患者及其信息的方法对于改善健康结果以及降低医疗保健可持续发展所需成本至关重要。一种这样的方法是以患者为中心的沟通。护患互动是护理科学和高质量护理的核心组成部分。弗莱舍等人认为,“在健康环境中,沟通和互动的主要意图是影响患者的健康状况或幸福状态”。作为一种职业,护理主要需要在个体层面与患者进行沟通和互动。在医院环境中,护士在床边与患者面对面承担许多与患者相关的职责,这些时刻可以促进护士与患者之间以患者为中心的有效互动。麦凯布等人指出,以患者为中心的沟通如兰格维茨等人所定义的那样,是“邀请并鼓励患者参与并就其自身护理的决策进行协商的沟通”。然而,麦凯布和韦拉德等人的定性研究强调,护士仅在进行行政或功能性活动时才与患者互动,并且护理“实践主要是以任务为导向的”。这些研究结果得到了毛雷尔等人关于支持患者和家属在医院环境中参与的工具和策略的报告的支持。毛雷尔等人发现,当前的策略“与患者和家属的住院体验不协调”,并且大多数工具和策略“更反映健康专业人员和医院的观点以及他们的工作组织方式”。该报告指出在参与的启动方面存在差距,这种差距不是由患者和家属的需求和偏好驱动的,而是由“医院提供的机会”驱动的。麦凯布等人还认为,护士的关注行为,即他们“通过使用非语言沟通来接近并愿意倾听患者的程度”,要求他们具备“真诚、热情和同理心”等基本要素,所有这些都是以患者为中心的沟通的组成部分。麦凯布等人观察到,“护士并不总是以患者为中心的方式进行沟通”。根据弗莱舍等人的说法,“倾听和提问方式中的倾听行为实际上是护患沟通关系的开始”。麦凯布等人指出,医疗保健组织对以患者为中心的沟通在提供高质量护理中的联系及后续重要性缺乏认可和支持,这导致了一种厌恶以患者为中心的沟通的文化,并且是降低护士向患者提供以患者为中心沟通的价值的一个重要因素。显然,服务质量与以患者为中心的护理原则和实践之间存在紧张关系。这种紧张关系对护理和个体患者的影响在文献中有所体现。麦凯布等人声称,使用非以患者为中心的沟通方式可能会对患者的幸福感和安全感产生负面影响。霍维等人详细描述了患者和家属未被其医疗保健提供者倾听的经历,并将由此产生的后果描述为与患者在住院期间死亡一样严重。