Suppr超能文献

经单侧椎弓根与双侧椎弓根入路椎体后凸成形术治疗慢性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的对比研究

Comparative study of kyphoplasty for chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures via unipedicular versus bipedicular approach.

作者信息

Chen Chunmao, Wei Haifeng, Zhang Wenjie, Gu Yong, Tang Genlin, Dong Renbin, Xu Yun, Chen Liang

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, China.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Oct;24(7):E62-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318228f470.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A comparative study of chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), which underwent kyphoplasty via unipedicular versus bipedicular approach.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical and radiographical outcomes in treating chronic painful OVCFs compared by unipedicular and bipedicular kyphoplasty (KP).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

OVCFs commonly occur in aged people and as many as one-third of them progress to chronic pain. Our previous research has proved that unipedicular and bipedicular KP can achieve comparable radiographical and clinical results in early stage. To give a medium-term and long-term assessment, we completed the comparison of outcomes 6 months and 2 years after surgery.

METHODS

Fifty patients with a total of 56 chronic painful OVCFs completed the follow-ups of 2 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after surgery. Group I (n=27) were treated with unipedicular KP and group II (n=23) with bipedicular KP. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index scores were compared within each group and between groups. The radiographic outcomes were evaluated by the restoration rate and vertebral height lost rate in the most compressed point of the vertebral bodies.

RESULTS

Significant improvement on the visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index scores were noted in each group (P<0.001), and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Although the restoration rate in group II was higher than in group I (P=0.005) in early stage, the height lost ratio showed no significant differences 6 months or 2 years later (P=0.746, 0.627).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic painful OVCFs should be candidates for KP, and there was no difference in pain relief when treated with either unipedicular or bipedicular KP.Although the bipedicular KP is more efficacious in vertebral height restoration in early stage, the unipedicular KP can maintain the same degree of the restored vertebral height in the long run.

摘要

研究设计

一项关于慢性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)的比较研究,这些骨折通过单椎弓根与双椎弓根入路进行椎体后凸成形术。

目的

评估单椎弓根与双椎弓根椎体后凸成形术(KP)治疗慢性疼痛性OVCFs的临床和影像学结果。

背景数据总结

OVCFs常见于老年人,其中多达三分之一会进展为慢性疼痛。我们之前的研究证明,单椎弓根和双椎弓根KP在早期可取得相当的影像学和临床结果。为了进行中长期评估,我们在术后6个月和2年完成了结果比较。

方法

50例共56处慢性疼痛性OVCFs患者完成了术后2周、6个月和2年的随访。I组(n = 27)接受单椎弓根KP治疗,II组(n = 23)接受双椎弓根KP治疗。比较每组内及组间术前和术后视觉模拟量表及Oswestry功能障碍指数评分。通过椎体最压缩点的恢复率和椎体高度丢失率评估影像学结果。

结果

每组的视觉模拟量表和Oswestry功能障碍指数评分均有显著改善(P < 0.001),两组之间无显著差异。虽然II组在早期的恢复率高于I组(P = 0.005),但6个月或2年后高度丢失率无显著差异(P = 0.746,0.627)。

结论

慢性疼痛性OVCFs应是KP的适应证,单椎弓根或双椎弓根KP治疗在疼痛缓解方面无差异。虽然双椎弓根KP在早期椎体高度恢复方面更有效,但从长远来看,单椎弓根KP可维持相同程度的椎体高度恢复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验