Fox K A
Department of Cardiology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.
Clin Cardiol. 1990 Mar;Suppl 5:V22-6; discussion V27-32. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960131307.
In the anistreplase, or anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) Intervention Mortality Study (AIMS), 1,258 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized in a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled mortality study in which they received either anistreplase or placebo, followed by anticoagulation therapy. Data on all adverse clinical events were recorded, regardless of their clinical significance or possible relation to therapy. There was a similar frequency of such events in both groups (anistreplase 80.4%, placebo 76.0%, difference not significant). Cardiovascular events included more reports of bradycardia, idioventricular rhythm, and hypotension in the anistreplase group, and a higher incidence of cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, complete heart block, and pericarditis in the placebo group. Hemorrhagic events occurred in 13.8% of patients in the anistreplase group compared with 4.1% of patients in the placebo group. Most of these events consisted of bleeding or bruising around the puncture sites. There was a low incidence of allergic events after administration of both anistreplase and placebo. Thirteen cerebrovascular events (8 strokes and 5 transient ischemic episodes) were reported in the anistreplase group, compared with 5 in the placebo group (5 and 0, respectively). The mean systolic and diastolic pressures were significantly lower (by 5-10 mmHg) in patients in the anistreplase group during the first 24 hours after dosing. There were no significant differences in temperature and pulse rate between the two groups. The incidence of chest pain during the first 4- to 24-h period was lower in the anistreplase-treated patients than in the placebo group. The frequency of in-hospital reinfarction was higher in anistreplase-treated patients compared with patients given placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物(APSAC)干预死亡率研究(AIMS)中,1258例急性心肌梗死患者被随机纳入一项平行、双盲、安慰剂对照的死亡率研究,他们接受茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物或安慰剂治疗,随后进行抗凝治疗。记录所有不良临床事件的数据,无论其临床意义或与治疗的可能关系如何。两组此类事件的发生率相似(茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物组为80.4%,安慰剂组为76.0%,差异无统计学意义)。心血管事件方面,茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物组有更多关于心动过缓、心室自身节律和低血压的报告,而安慰剂组心脏骤停、心室颤动、完全性心脏传导阻滞和心包炎的发生率更高。茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物组13.8%的患者发生出血事件,而安慰剂组为4.1%。这些事件大多为穿刺部位周围出血或瘀伤。使用茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物和安慰剂后过敏事件的发生率均较低。茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物组报告了13例脑血管事件(8例中风和5例短暂性缺血发作),而安慰剂组为5例(分别为5例和0例)。给药后最初24小时内,茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物组患者的平均收缩压和舒张压显著降低(降低5 - 10 mmHg)。两组之间体温和脉搏率无显著差异。在最初4至24小时内,接受茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物治疗的患者胸痛发生率低于安慰剂组。与接受安慰剂的患者相比,接受茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物治疗的患者院内再梗死频率更高。(摘要截短于250字)