• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The measurement of time-averaged flow by magnetic resonance imaging using continuous acquisition in the carotid arteries and its comparison with Doppler ultrasound.

作者信息

Tarnawski M, Padayachee S, West D J, Graves M J, Ayton V T, Taylor M G, Smith M A

机构信息

Division of Radiological Sciences, UMDS, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1990 Feb;11(1):27-36. doi: 10.1088/0143-0815/11/1/002.

DOI:10.1088/0143-0815/11/1/002
PMID:2182272
Abstract

A continuous acquisition method was used to measure the time-averaged flow in the carotid arteries of 10 normal volunteers, using an interleaved flow-sensitive and flow-compensated field echo sequence on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance (MR) system. Validation of the sequence and technique was performed using a pulsatile rotating phantom. The measured flow rates for the common carotid arteries were compared with Doppler ultrasound values obtained immediately after the MR measurement using a Duplex scanner. The correlation (r = 0.52, P less than 0.01) was significant with data spread accounted for by the inherent errors of both techniques. The difference between time-averaged flow measured by MR and Doppler ultrasound was 1.9%. Short-term reproducibility of each technique was assessed by consecutive measurements with values of 6.8% and 6.6% respectively for MR and Doppler; measurements after a 2 - 4 week interval gave a long-term reproducibility of 11.8% and 9.8% respectively. The advantages of continuous acquisition make the method suitable for non-invasive flow measurements, particularly for vessels that are not accessible to ultrasound.

摘要

相似文献

1
The measurement of time-averaged flow by magnetic resonance imaging using continuous acquisition in the carotid arteries and its comparison with Doppler ultrasound.
Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1990 Feb;11(1):27-36. doi: 10.1088/0143-0815/11/1/002.
2
[ECG-triggered magnetic resonance tomographic measurement of blood flow velocity in the carotid arteries: comparison with duplex sonography].
Digitale Bilddiagn. 1988 Sep;8(3):110-4.
3
Quantitative measurement of high flow velocities by a spin echo MR technique.通过自旋回波磁共振技术对高流速进行定量测量。
Radiat Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;9(6):217-22.
4
Blood flow volume quantification of cerebral ischemia: comparison of three noninvasive imaging techniques of carotid and vertebral arteries.脑缺血血流容积定量:三种颈动脉和椎动脉无创成像技术的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Mar;178(3):551-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.3.1780551.
5
Measurement of flow with NMR imaging using a gradient pulse and phase difference technique.使用梯度脉冲和相位差技术通过核磁共振成像测量流量。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984 Aug;8(4):588-93. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198408000-00002.
6
Measurement of flow in small vessels by magnetic resonance phase mapping techniques: an in vitro and in vivo study.
MAGMA. 1997 Jun;5(2):173-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02592249.
7
Quantification of blood flow in the carotid arteries: comparison of Doppler ultrasound and three different phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging sequences.颈动脉血流定量分析:多普勒超声与三种不同相位对比磁共振成像序列的比较。
Invest Radiol. 2001 Nov;36(11):642-7. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200111000-00003.
8
Magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow with a phase subtraction technique. In vitro and in vivo validation.
Invest Radiol. 1993 Feb;28(2):109-15. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199302000-00004.
9
Magnetic resonance velocity measurements in small arteries. Comparison with Doppler ultrasonic measurements in the aortas of normal rabbits.
Invest Radiol. 1992 Jul;27(7):499-503. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199207000-00002.
10
Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding.迂曲动脉内峰值速度测量:相位对比磁共振成像中多方向速度编码的影响。
Invest Radiol. 2014 Apr;49(4):189-94. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000013.

引用本文的文献

1
Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.双功能超声用于诊断颅外段有症状颈动脉狭窄。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 11;7(7):CD013172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013172.pub2.
2
Inter- and intra-rater reliability of blood and cerebrospinal fluid flow quantification by phase-contrast MRI.相位对比 MRI 测量血液和脑脊液流动的组内和组间可靠性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Sep;38(3):655-62. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24013. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
3
Optimization of MR phase-contrast-based flow velocimetry and shear stress measurements.
基于磁共振相位对比的流速和切应力测量的优化。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Feb;26 Suppl 1:133-42. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9572-9. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
4
Changing concepts of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics: role of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and implications for cerebral microvascular disease.脑脊液流体动力学概念的转变:相位对比磁共振成像的作用及其对脑微血管疾病的影响
Neurotherapeutics. 2007 Jul;4(3):511-22. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.04.007.
5
Blood-flow volume quantification in internal carotid and vertebral arteries: comparison of 3 different ultrasound techniques with phase-contrast MR imaging.颈内动脉和椎动脉血流容积定量分析:3种不同超声技术与相位对比磁共振成像的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Feb;27(2):363-9.
6
Clinical features associated with internal carotid artery occlusion do not correlate with MRA cerebropetal flow measurements.与颈内动脉闭塞相关的临床特征与MRA向脑血流测量结果不相关。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;70(3):333-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.3.333.
7
Measurement of flow in small vessels by magnetic resonance phase mapping techniques: an in vitro and in vivo study.
MAGMA. 1997 Jun;5(2):173-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02592249.