Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, 130 Mulford Hall #3114, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Jun;184(6):3653-74. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2214-4. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
Despite California policies requiring assessment of ambient wetland condition and compensatory wetland mitigations, no intensive monitoring tools have been developed to evaluate freshwater wetlands within the state. Therefore, we developed standardized, wadeable field methods to sample macroinvertebrate communities and evaluated 40 wetlands across Northern California to develop a macroinvertebrate index of biotic integrity (IBI). A priori reference sites were selected with minimal urban impacts, representing a best-attainable condition. We screened 56 macroinvertebrate metrics for inclusion in the IBI based on responsiveness to percent urbanization. Eight final metrics were selected for inclusion in the IBI: percent three dominant taxa; scraper richness; percent Ephemeroptera, Odonata, and Trichoptera (EOT); EOT richness; percent Tanypodinae/Chironomidae; Oligochaeta richness; percent Coleoptera; and predator richness. The IBI (potential range 0-100) demonstrated significant discriminatory power between the reference (mean = 69) and impacted wetlands (mean = 28). It also declined with increasing percent urbanization (R (2) = 0.53, p < 0.005) among wetlands in an independent validation dataset (n = 14). The IBI was robust in showing no significant bias with environmental gradients. This IBI is a functional tool to determine the ecological condition at urban (stormwater and flood control ponds), as well as rural freshwater wetlands (stockponds, seasonal wetlands, and natural ponds). Biological differences between perennial and non-perennial wetlands suggest that developing separate indicators for these wetland types may improve applicability, although the existing data set was not sufficient for exploring this option.
尽管加利福尼亚州制定了评估环境湿地状况和补偿性湿地缓解措施的政策,但仍未开发出密集的监测工具来评估该州的淡水湿地。因此,我们开发了标准化的涉水实地采样方法来采集大型无脊椎动物群落,并评估了加利福尼亚州北部的 40 个湿地,以制定大型无脊椎动物生物完整性指数(IBI)。先验参考点是在最小的城市影响下选择的,代表了最佳可达状态。我们根据对城市化百分率的响应筛选了 56 个大型无脊椎动物指标,以纳入 IBI。最终选择了 8 个指标纳入 IBI:三种主要类群的百分比;刮泥器丰富度;蜉蝣目、蜻蜓目和襀翅目(EOT)的百分比;EOT 丰富度;Tanypodinae/Chironomidae 的百分比;寡毛类丰富度;鞘翅目比例;以及捕食者丰富度。IBI(潜在范围 0-100)在参考湿地(平均值=69)和受影响湿地(平均值=28)之间表现出显著的区分能力。在独立验证数据集(n=14)中,随着湿地城市化百分率的增加(R (2)=0.53,p<0.005),IBI 也呈下降趋势。IBI 在没有明显环境梯度偏差方面表现稳健。该 IBI 是一种功能工具,可用于确定城市(雨水和洪水控制池塘)以及农村淡水湿地(蓄水池、季节性湿地和自然池塘)的生态状况。永久性和非永久性湿地之间的生物差异表明,为这些湿地类型开发单独的指标可能会提高适用性,尽管现有数据集不足以探索此选项。