MGEN Foundation for Public Health, Paris, France.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Sep;20(3):182-91. doi: 10.1002/mpr.346. Epub 2011 Aug 7.
The use of services for mental problems is generally reported as being relatively low. However, the methods used for data collection in surveys may have influenced the quality of self-reported service use. This study compares the information on recourse to physicians for mental problems reported in different sections of a survey conducted in six European countries. Thus, 5545 respondents were asked questions on contacts with physicians at least twice: (1) after the symptoms checklist in any completed diagnostic section, and (2) in a section devoted to use of care for mental problems. Of these 39.3% reported contacts with physicians about mental problems in the diagnostic sections, whereas 29.5% did so in the use-of-care section. Inconsistencies concerned 20.1% of participants, among whom those reporting consultations in diagnostic sections without reporting them in the use-of-care section represented the majority (74.4%). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that age, marital status, educational level and country were associated with under-reporting in the use-of-care section, as well as having mood or sleep problems. In conclusion, services used for mental health reasons when measured through a question referring to use of care due to the presence of a mental problem may underestimate the care people received for their problems.
精神问题服务的使用通常报告的相对较低。然而,调查中用于数据收集的方法可能会影响自我报告服务使用的质量。本研究比较了在六个欧洲国家进行的调查的不同部分报告的精神问题求助医生的信息。因此,有 5545 名受访者被问到关于与医生接触的问题,至少两次:(1)在任何已完成的诊断部分的症状检查表之后,以及(2)在专门用于精神问题护理使用的部分。其中 39.3%在诊断部分报告了与医生接触的精神问题,而 29.5%在护理使用部分报告了与医生接触的精神问题。不一致涉及 20.1%的参与者,其中在诊断部分报告咨询但未在护理使用部分报告的占大多数(74.4%)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,年龄、婚姻状况、教育水平和国家与护理使用部分的报告不足有关,以及情绪或睡眠问题。总之,当通过一个关于由于存在精神问题而使用护理的问题来衡量精神卫生服务的使用时,可能会低估人们为解决问题而接受的护理。