Acute Medical Unit, York Hospital, York, UK.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2011 Jul;49(6):452-6. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2011.594054.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) is the government body with responsibility for regulating new and existing medicines and medical devices in the United Kingdom. The Yellow Card scheme is a well-established pharmacovigilance system that collects voluntary reports of adverse effects associated with therapeutic drug use. In contrast, data concerning clinical toxicological effects are more poorly characterised. No comparable surveillance processes exist in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in Europe that might allow systematic collection of clinical data and outcomes after drug overdose. Toxicological effects are normally ascertained from individual patient reports or small case series from a few specialised poisons units, so that these data are generally under-represented in post-marketing consideration of risks and benefits. Safety concerns may lead to withdrawal of the Marketing Authorisation or restricted prescribing conditions, which are conveyed to health care professionals by means of safety warnings. These may have a variable impact, and three selected examples are presented to illustrate the complex interaction between drug regulation and clinical toxicology. First, the effects of the withdrawal of rofecoxib in 2004 shows that regulatory responses may reduce the prescribing of drugs across a particular class, and this has resulted in fewer enquiries to Poisons Control Centres regarding all cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors. Secondly, data concerning the impact of safety warnings about antipsychotic medications illustrate that regulatory decisions may have a variable impact due to other factors that influence prescribing, including clinical guidelines, marketing pressures, and lack of alternative safe medications. Finally, the recent withdrawal of co-proxamol serves as an example of how clinical toxicology data can inform the drug regulation process and improve safety by minimising the risk of death associated with overdose. Greater reliance on clinical toxicology data could better inform the drug regulation process, perhaps through coordinated data collection systems that already exist in certain national poisons centres. Routine collection of high quality data concerning the effects of drug overdose could allow a more comprehensive review of risk and benefit by the regulatory authorities.
英国药品和保健产品监管局(MHRA)是负责监管英国新老药品和医疗器械的政府机构。黄卡计划是一个成熟的药物警戒系统,收集与治疗性药物使用相关的不良反应自愿报告。相比之下,关于临床毒理学效应的数据则描述得较差。在英国或欧洲其他地方,没有类似的监测流程可以系统地收集药物过量后的临床数据和结果。毒理学效应通常是从个别患者报告或少数几个专门毒物单位的小病例系列中确定的,因此这些数据在上市后考虑风险和效益时通常代表性不足。安全问题可能导致药物撤市或限制处方条件,这些都会通过安全警告传达给医疗保健专业人员。这些警告可能会产生不同的影响,本文选择了三个例子来说明药物监管和临床毒理学之间的复杂相互作用。首先,罗非昔布于 2004 年撤市的影响表明,监管反应可能会减少特定类别的药物处方,这导致毒物控制中心对所有环氧化酶-2 选择性抑制剂的咨询减少。其次,关于抗精神病药物安全警告影响的数据表明,由于影响处方的其他因素,包括临床指南、营销压力和缺乏替代安全药物,监管决策可能会产生不同的影响。最后,最近将可待因复方片撤市的例子说明了临床毒理学数据如何为药物监管过程提供信息,并通过最小化与过量相关的死亡风险来提高安全性。更多地依赖临床毒理学数据可以更好地为药物监管过程提供信息,也许可以通过某些国家毒物中心已经存在的协调数据收集系统来实现。常规收集关于药物过量影响的高质量数据,可以让监管机构更全面地审查风险和效益。