Department of Child Dental Health, Bristol Dental Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol, UK.
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Dec;34(6):768-72. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr096. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
The aim of this investigation was to determine the optimal format for presenting the 5-year-olds' Index reference models for the assessment of dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). The 5-year-olds' Index reference models were presented in four different formats: plaster models, coloured acrylic models, and two digital formats, which included three-dimensional digital models (3D), and black and white photographs. These formats were used to rate 45 plaster models of patients born with UCLP by a total of seven examiners comprising experienced and inexperienced examiners. Scoring was undertaken 1 week apart for each format with the patient models reassigned on each occasion to reduce the effect of memory bias. For intra-examiner agreement, the patient models were scored 3 weeks later under similar conditions by the same examiners. The reliability of using the different formats was determined using the plaster reference models as the 'gold' standard for comparison. Analysis of the results using weighted kappa (k) statistics showed the magnitude of agreement for all the formats of the 5-year-olds' Index were good to very good between examiners. The more experienced examiners were consistently more reliable in their scoring using the different formats. This study clearly demonstrated that 3D digital models of the 5-year-olds' Index could prove to be a promising alternative to physical models of the 5-year-olds' Index.
本研究旨在确定呈现 5 岁儿童牙弓关系评估的腭裂(UCLP)指数参考模型的最佳格式。呈现了 5 岁儿童指数参考模型的四种不同格式:石膏模型、彩色丙烯酸模型以及两种数字格式,包括三维数字模型(3D)和黑白照片。这四种格式用于由 7 名检查者(包括有经验和无经验的检查者)对 45 个患有 UCLP 的患者的石膏模型进行评分。每种格式的评分间隔为 1 周,每次都会重新分配患者模型以减少记忆偏差的影响。对于内部检查者一致性,在类似条件下,同一检查者在 3 周后对相同患者模型进行评分。使用石膏参考模型作为比较的“金标准”来确定使用不同格式的可靠性。使用加权 Kappa(k)统计分析结果显示,对于所有格式的 5 岁儿童指数,检查者之间的一致性都很好,甚至非常好。经验更丰富的检查者在使用不同格式进行评分时始终更可靠。这项研究清楚地表明,5 岁儿童指数的 3D 数字模型可能成为 5 岁儿童指数物理模型的有前途的替代方案。