Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois, Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Sep 15;174(6):736-43. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr153. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
For analysis of case-control genetic association studies, it has recently been shown that gene-environment independence in the population can be leveraged to increase efficiency for estimating gene-environment interaction effects in comparison with the standard prospective analysis. However, for the special case in which data on the binary phenotype and genetic and environmental risk factors can be summarized in a 2 × 2 × 2 table, the authors show here that there is no efficiency gain for estimating interaction effects, nor is there an efficiency gain for estimating the genetic and environmental main effects. This contrasts with the well-known result assuming that rare phenotype prevalence and gene-environment independence in the control population for the same data can lead to efficiency gain. This discrepancy is counterintuitive, since the 2 likelihoods are also approximately equal when the phenotype is rare. An explanation for the paradox based on a theoretical analysis is provided. Implications of these results for data analyses are also examined, and practical guidance on analyzing such case-control studies is offered.
对于病例对照遗传关联研究的分析,最近已经表明,在人群中利用基因-环境独立性可以提高估计基因-环境交互作用效果的效率,与标准前瞻性分析相比。然而,对于可以在 2×2×2 表中总结二进制表型和遗传及环境风险因素数据的特殊情况,作者在此表明,对于估计交互作用效果没有效率增益,也没有对于估计遗传和环境主要效果的效率增益。这与众所周知的结果形成对比,该结果假设对于相同数据,罕见表型流行率和对照人群中的基因-环境独立性可以导致效率增益。这种差异是违反直觉的,因为当表型罕见时,两个似然函数也大致相等。提供了基于理论分析的对这种悖论的解释。还检查了这些结果对数据分析的影响,并提供了分析这种病例对照研究的实用指南。