• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

森林的异速生长和分配:通量网的视角。

Allometric growth and allocation in forests: a perspective from FLUXNET.

机构信息

Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2011 Jul;21(5):1546-56. doi: 10.1890/10-1201.1.

DOI:10.1890/10-1201.1
PMID:21830701
Abstract

To develop a scheme for partitioning the products of photosynthesis toward different biomass components in land-surface models, a database on component mass and net primary productivity (NPP), collected from FLUXNET sites, was examined to determine allometric patterns of allocation. We found that NPP per individual of foliage (Gfol), stem and branches (Gstem), coarse roots (Gcroot) and fine roots (Gfroot) in individual trees is largely explained (r2 = 67-91%) by the magnitude of total NPP per individual (G). Gfol scales with G isometrically, meaning it is a fixed fraction of G ( 25%). Root-shoot trade-offs were manifest as a slow decline in Gfroot, as a fraction of G, from 50% to 25% as stands increased in biomass, with Gstem and Gcroot increasing as a consequence. These results indicate that a functional trade-off between aboveground and belowground allocation is essentially captured by variations in G, which itself is largely governed by stand biomass and only secondarily by site-specific resource availability. We argue that forests are characterized by strong competition for light, observed as a race for individual trees to ascend by increasing partitioning toward wood, rather than by growing more leaves, and that this competition stronglyconstrains the allocational plasticity that trees may be capable of. The residual variation in partitioning was not related to climatic or edaphic factors, nor did plots with nutrient or water additions show a pattern of partitioning distinct from that predicted by G alone. These findings leverage short-term process studies of the terrestrial carbon cycle to improve decade-scale predictions of biomass accumulation in forests. An algorithm for calculating partitioning in land-surface models is presented.

摘要

为了在陆面模型中制定一种将光合作用产物分配到不同生物量组分的方案,我们研究了通量网(FLUXNET)站点收集的关于组分质量和净初级生产力(NPP)的数据库,以确定分配的种间权衡关系。我们发现,个体树木的叶(Gfol)、茎和枝(Gstem)、粗根(Gcroot)和细根(Gfroot)的个体 NPP 很大程度上可以用个体总 NPP(G)来解释(r2=67-91%)。Gfol 与 G 等比生长,这意味着它是 G 的一个固定分数(25%)。根-茎权衡表现为,随着生物量的增加,Gfroot 占 G 的比例从 50%缓慢下降到 25%,而 Gstem 和 Gcroot 则相应增加。这些结果表明,地上和地下分配之间的功能权衡主要由 G 的变化来捕获,而 G 本身主要由林分生物量决定,其次由特定地点的资源可用性决定。我们认为,森林的特点是对光的强烈竞争,表现为个体树木通过增加木材分配来争取上升,而不是通过增加更多的叶子,这种竞争强烈限制了树木可能具有的分配可塑性。分配的剩余变化与气候或土壤因素无关,养分或水分添加的样地也没有表现出与仅由 G 预测的不同的分配模式。这些发现利用了陆地碳循环的短期过程研究来提高森林生物量积累的十年尺度预测。提出了一种在陆面模型中计算分配的算法。

相似文献

1
Allometric growth and allocation in forests: a perspective from FLUXNET.森林的异速生长和分配:通量网的视角。
Ecol Appl. 2011 Jul;21(5):1546-56. doi: 10.1890/10-1201.1.
2
The allocation of ecosystem net primary productivity in tropical forests.热带森林生态系统净初级生产力的分配。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 27;366(1582):3225-45. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0062.
3
Allometry of fine roots in forest ecosystems.林生态系统细根的异速生长。
Ecol Lett. 2019 Feb;22(2):322-331. doi: 10.1111/ele.13193. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
4
Carbon budget for Scots pine trees: effects of size, competition and site fertility on growth allocation and production.苏格兰松树的碳预算:大小、竞争和立地肥力对生长分配和产量的影响
Tree Physiol. 2005 Jan;25(1):17-30. doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.1.17.
5
Above- and belowground biomass and net primary production in a 73-year-old Scots pine forest.一片树龄73年的苏格兰松树林的地上和地下生物量及净初级生产力。
Tree Physiol. 2003 Jun;23(8):505-16. doi: 10.1093/treephys/23.8.505.
6
Global-scale patterns of nutrient density and partitioning in forests in relation to climate.全球尺度上森林养分密度和分配格局与气候的关系。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jan;24(1):536-551. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13860. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
7
Allocation of gross primary production in forest ecosystems: allometric constraints and environmental responses.森林生态系统中初级总生产量的分配:异速生长限制与环境响应
New Phytol. 2013 Dec;200(4):1176-86. doi: 10.1111/nph.12426. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
8
Canopy leaf area constrains [CO2]-induced enhancement of productivity and partitioning among aboveground carbon pools.冠层叶面积限制了[二氧化碳]诱导的生产力提高以及地上碳库之间的分配。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19;103(51):19356-61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609448103. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
9
Stand-level patterns of carbon fluxes and partitioning in a Eucalyptus grandis plantation across a gradient of productivity, in Sao Paulo State, Brazil.巴西圣保罗州生产力梯度下大桉树人工林的碳通量和分配的林分水平格局。
Tree Physiol. 2012 Jun;32(6):696-706. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps038. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
10
Testing the generality of above-ground biomass allometry across plant functional types at the continent scale.在大陆尺度上测试地上生物量异速生长在不同植物功能类型间的普遍性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jun;22(6):2106-24. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13201. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Trade-Offs of Plant Biomass by Precipitation Regulation Across the Sanjiangyuan Region of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.青藏高原三江源地区降水调控对植物生物量的权衡
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jul 27;14(15):2325. doi: 10.3390/plants14152325.
2
Toward a metabolic theory of catchments: Scaling of water and carbon fluxes with size.迈向集水区代谢理论:水通量和碳通量随规模的缩放关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 15;121(42):e2410736121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2410736121. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
3
Contrasting responses of woody and grassland ecosystems to increased CO as water supply varies.
增水条件下 CO 增加对木本和草本生态系统的对比响应。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar;6(3):315-323. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01642-6. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Reference carbon cycle dataset for typical Chinese forests via colocated observations and data assimilation.通过同位观测和数据同化为典型中国森林生成参考碳循环数据集。
Sci Data. 2021 Feb 2;8(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00826-w.
5
Dynamic allometric scaling of tree biomass and size.树木生物量和大小的动态异速生长。
Nat Plants. 2021 Jan;7(1):42-49. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00815-8. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
6
The sensitivity of the forest carbon budget shifts across processes along with stand development and climate change.森林碳预算的敏感性随着林分发育和气候变化沿过程发生变化。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Mar;29(2):e01837. doi: 10.1002/eap.1837. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
7
Allocation of forest biomass across broad precipitation gradients in China's forests.中国森林横跨广泛降水梯度的森林生物量分配。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 12;8(1):10536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28899-5.
8
Evaluation of climate-related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests.北方和温带森林全球植被模型中与气候相关的碳周转过程评估。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Aug;23(8):3076-3091. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13660. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
9
Biogeographical patterns of biomass allocation in leaves, stems, and roots in China's forests.中国森林中叶片、茎干和根系生物量分配的生物地理格局。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 3;5:15997. doi: 10.1038/srep15997.
10
Temperature drives global patterns in forest biomass distribution in leaves, stems, and roots.温度驱动着全球范围内森林生物量在树叶、树干和树根中的分布模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 23;111(38):13721-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216053111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.