Jose R, Kumar A, Thavasi V, Ramakrishna S
NUS Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Initiative (NUSNNI), National University of Singapore, 117576, Singapore.
Nanotechnology. 2008 Oct 22;19(42):424004. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/42/424004. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
The electrochemical and optical properties of three indoline dyes, namely C(35)H(28)N(2)O(2) (D131), C(37)H(30)N(2)O(3)S(2) (D102), and C(42)H(35)N(3)O(4)S(3) (D149), were studied and compared with that of the N3 dye. D131 has the largest bandgap and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies compared to the other dyes. A size-dependent variation in the absorptivity of the indoline dyes was observed-the absorptivity increased with increase in the molecular size. The dyes were anchored onto TiO(2) nanorods. The TiO(2) nanorods were obtained by electrospinning a polymeric solution containing titanium isopropoxide and polyvinylpyrrolidone and subsequent sintering of the as-spun composite fibers. Absorption spectral measurements of the dye-anchored TiO(2) showed blue shifts in the excitonic transition of the indoline dyes, the magnitude of which increased with decrease in the molecular size. Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) were fabricated using the indoline dyes, TiO(2) nanorods, and iodide/triiodide electrolyte. The D131 dye showed comparable energy conversion efficiency (η) to that of the N3 dye. A systematic change in the short circuit current density (J(SC)) and η of the indoline DSSCs was observed. The observed variation in J(C) is most likely originated from the difference in the electronic coupling strengths between the dye and the TiO(2).
研究了三种吲哚啉染料,即C(35)H(28)N(2)O(2)(D131)、C(37)H(30)N(2)O(3)S(2)(D102)和C(42)H(35)N(3)O(4)S(3)(D149)的电化学和光学性质,并与N3染料进行了比较。与其他染料相比,D131具有最大的带隙和最低的未占据分子轨道(LUMO)能量。观察到吲哚啉染料的吸光度存在尺寸依赖性变化——吸光度随分子尺寸的增加而增加。这些染料被锚定在TiO(2)纳米棒上。通过静电纺丝含有异丙醇钛和聚乙烯吡咯烷酮的聚合物溶液并随后烧结初纺复合纤维来获得TiO(2)纳米棒。染料锚定的TiO(2)的吸收光谱测量显示吲哚啉染料的激子跃迁发生蓝移,其幅度随分子尺寸的减小而增加。使用吲哚啉染料、TiO(2)纳米棒和碘化物/三碘化物电解质制备了染料敏化太阳能电池(DSSC)。D131染料表现出与N3染料相当的能量转换效率(η)。观察到吲哚啉DSSC的短路电流密度(J(SC))和η有系统变化。观察到的J(C)变化很可能源于染料与TiO(2)之间电子耦合强度的差异。