Suppr超能文献

95名健康受试者胸廓出口的临床、流量测定及放射学研究:生理局限性与实际影响

[Clinical, flowmetric and radiologic study of the thoracic outlet in 95 healthy subjects: physiologic limitations and practical impact].

作者信息

Hachulla E, Camilléri G, Fournier C, Vinckier L

机构信息

Service de Médecine Interne, Clinique Médicale A, CHU-Hôpital Cl. Huriez, Lille.

出版信息

Rev Med Interne. 1990 Jan-Feb;11(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/s0248-8663(05)80603-4.

Abstract

Ninety-five healthy subjects have been examined regarding the presence of symptomatic compression of the brachial plexus and subclavian vessels (Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: TOS). Each subject was examined clinically and by Doppler flowmetry during performance of Adson, hyperabduction and abduction-external-rotation manoeuvres. In all subjects Roos test and X-ray examinations of the cervical spine and thoracic aperture were performed. The response was considered positive when the radial pulse disappeared for the clinical test, and when the flow was totally arrested for the Doppler flowmetry. Adson's manoeuvre showed a 1% clinical positive response and a 0% doppler positive response. Hyperabduction at 45 degrees showed a 0% positive response both clinically and by Doppler flowmetry; at 90 degrees, it showed positive response of 6% and 1% respectively, and at 180 degrees it showed positive responses of 40% and 11%. Abduction-external-rotation manoeuvres showed 14% clinical and 7% Doppler positive responses. The Roos test was positive for 8% of the subjects and X-ray was abnormal for 13% of the subjects. We conclude that: Doppler flowmetry is useful for the TOS diagnosis only when the clinical evaluation is abnormal. Total arrest of flow is sometimes temporary; arterial flow must be examined at least 20 seconds. Total arrest of flow is never seen during Adson manoeuvre or hyperabduction at 45 degrees or 90 degrees in healthy subjects. Clinical or Doppler perturbation is not significantly higher for healthy subjects presenting an X-ray abnormality.

摘要

对95名健康受试者进行了检查,以确定是否存在臂丛神经和锁骨下血管的症状性压迫(胸廓出口综合征:TOS)。在进行Adson试验、过度外展试验和外展-外旋试验时,对每名受试者进行了临床检查和多普勒血流测定。对所有受试者进行了Roos试验以及颈椎和胸廓入口的X线检查。临床检查时桡动脉搏动消失以及多普勒血流测定时血流完全停止,则判定为阳性反应。Adson试验临床阳性反应率为1%,多普勒阳性反应率为0%。45度过度外展试验临床和多普勒阳性反应率均为0%;90度时,临床阳性反应率为6%,多普勒阳性反应率为1%,180度时,临床阳性反应率为40%,多普勒阳性反应率为11%。外展-外旋试验临床阳性反应率为14%,多普勒阳性反应率为7%。Roos试验8%的受试者为阳性,X线检查13%的受试者异常。我们得出结论:只有当临床评估异常时,多普勒血流测定对TOS诊断才有用。血流完全停止有时是暂时的;必须至少检查20秒的动脉血流。在健康受试者进行Adson试验或45度或90度过度外展试验时,从未出现血流完全停止的情况。对于X线检查异常的健康受试者,临床或多普勒干扰并无显著增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验