Department of Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Aug;35(4):868-74. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0241-8. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
New technologies for microwave ablation (MWA) have been conceived, designed to achieve larger areas of necrosis compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The purpose of this study was to report complications by using this technique in patients with focal liver cancer.
Members of 14 Italian centers used a 2.45-GMHz generator delivering energy through a cooled miniature-choke MW antenna and a standardized protocol for follow-up. They completed a questionnaire regarding number and type of deaths, major and minor complications and side effects, and likelihood of their relationship to the procedure. Enrollment included 736 patients with 1.037 lesions: 522 had hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis, 187 had metastases predominantly from colorectal cancer, and 27 had cholangiocellular carcinoma. Tumor size ranged from 0.5 to 10 cm. In 13 centers, the approach used was percutaneous, in 4 videolaparoscopic, and in 3 laparotomic.
No deaths were reported. Major complications occurred in 22 cases (2.9%), and minor complications in 54 patients (7.3%). Complications of MWA do not differ from those RFA, both being based on the heat damage.
Results of this multicenter study confirmed those of single-center experiences, indicating that MWA is a safe procedure, with no mortality and a low rate of major complications. The low rate of complications was probably due to precautions adopted, knowing in advance possible risk conditions, on the basis of prior RFA experience.
新的微波消融(MWA)技术已经被设想出来,旨在与射频消融(RFA)相比实现更大的坏死面积。本研究的目的是报告使用该技术治疗局灶性肝癌患者的并发症。
14 个意大利中心的成员使用 2.45GHz 发生器,通过冷却的微型扼流圈 MW 天线传输能量,并采用标准化的随访方案。他们填写了一份问卷,内容包括死亡人数和类型、主要和次要并发症及副作用,以及它们与该程序的关系的可能性。入组患者包括 736 例 1.037 个病灶:522 例为伴有肝硬化的肝细胞癌,187 例为主要来源于结直肠癌的转移灶,27 例为胆管细胞癌。肿瘤大小从 0.5 厘米至 10 厘米不等。在 13 个中心,采用经皮入路,4 个中心采用腹腔镜,3 个中心采用剖腹手术。
未报告死亡病例。22 例(2.9%)发生重大并发症,54 例(7.3%)发生轻微并发症。MWA 的并发症与 RFA 相似,均基于热损伤。
这项多中心研究的结果与单中心经验一致,表明 MWA 是一种安全的操作方法,无死亡率,主要并发症发生率低。并发症发生率低可能是由于采用了预防措施,根据先前 RFA 的经验,提前了解可能的风险情况。