Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Am Heart J. 2011 Aug;162(2):363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
Insufficient platelet inhibition is a major determinant of stent thrombosis (STh), although the etiology is multifactorial. On-clopidogrel platelet reactivity was investigated in patients with previous angiographically confirmed STh, myocardial infarction (MI), and controls.
Using the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry, we identified patients with angiographically confirmed STh (n = 48) or MI (n = 30) while on dual antiplatelet therapy within 6 months of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and matched control patients (n = 78). On-clopidogrel platelet reactivity was measured with VerifyNow P2Y12 and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay.
The mean P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) was higher (246.8 ± 75.9 vs 200.0 ± 82.7, P = .001) in STh patients compared with controls. The optimal cutoff for STh was 222 PRU or higher (area under the curve 0.69, P < .0001) in a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. The cutoff level resulted in 70.2% sensitivity and 67.3% specificity. There was no significant difference in mean PRU but a higher device-reported percent inhibition (45.1 ± 23.8 vs 32.1 ± 23.2, P = .04) in patients with MI compared with controls. Results with the VASP phosphorylation assay were not related to the occurrence of STh or MI.
STh was associated with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity measured with VerifyNow (cutoff level of PRU ≥222) but spontaneous MI in stented patients on clopidogrel treatment was not. There was, however, a substantial overlap in on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity between patients with and without on-treatment STh questioning the clinical use of platelet function testing to identify patients at high risk for STh.
尽管支架血栓形成(STh)的病因是多因素的,但血小板抑制不足是 STh 的主要决定因素。本研究旨在检测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)期间发生过造影证实的 STh、心肌梗死(MI)和对照组患者的氯吡格雷抵抗情况。
利用瑞典冠状动脉血管造影和血管成形术登记处的数据,我们确定了在 PCI 后 6 个月内 DAPT 期间发生过造影证实的 STh(n = 48)或 MI(n = 30)和匹配对照组患者(n = 78)。使用 VerifyNow P2Y12 和血管扩张刺激磷蛋白(VASP)磷酸化试验来检测氯吡格雷抵抗情况。
与对照组相比,STh 患者的 P2Y12 反应单位(PRU)更高(246.8 ± 75.9 比 200.0 ± 82.7,P =.001)。在受试者工作特征(ROC)分析中,STh 的最佳截断值为 222 PRU 或更高(曲线下面积 0.69,P <.0001),截断值为 70.2%的敏感性和 67.3%的特异性。两组间的平均 PRU 无显著差异,但 MI 组的设备报告的抑制率更高(45.1 ± 23.8 比 32.1 ± 23.2,P =.04)。VASP 磷酸化试验结果与 STh 或 MI 的发生无关。
氯吡格雷抵抗与通过 VerifyNow 检测到的 STh (PRU 截断值≥222)相关,但接受氯吡格雷治疗的支架置入患者发生自发性 MI 与氯吡格雷抵抗无关。STh 患者与未发生 STh 患者之间存在大量氯吡格雷抵抗的重叠,这对使用血小板功能试验来识别发生 STh 风险高的患者的临床应用提出了质疑。