• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第 7 版 AJCC 分期系统作为肝癌临床分期系统的预后价值。

Prognostic value of the 7th edition of the AJCC staging system as a clinical staging system in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2011 Nov;47(17):2568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2011.07.002
PMID:21835608
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In 2009, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) published the 7th edition of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) staging system. We investigated the prognostic value of the 7th AJCC staging system as a clinical staging system in patients with HCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively applied the 6th and 7th AJCC systems to 877 patients who were diagnosed with HCC between January 2004 and December 2006 using radiological findings and compared the performance of the AJCC systems to that of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system. The prognostic power was quantified using a linear trend χ(2) test and -2 log likelihood.

RESULTS

The median age was 57years and males predominated (n=701, 79.9%). There was no significant difference in survival between adjoining advanced stages of the 6th and 7th AJCC systems (⩾stage IIIA in the 6th and ⩾stage IIIB in the 7th; all p>0.05), although a significant difference between adjoining early stages was identified. The 7th AJCC system had greater prognostic power than the 6th (linear trend χ(2) test, 168.195 versus 160.293; -2 log likelihood, 7366.347 versus 7396.380), but not greater than that of the BCLC system (linear trend χ(2) test=207.013, -2 log likelihood=7320.726).

CONCLUSIONS

The 7th AJCC staging system provided better prognostic power than the 6th for patients with HCC, but not better than that of the BCLC system. Thus, the 7th AJCC staging system should be applied cautiously in patients with advanced HCC because of its low prognostic power in advanced stages.

摘要

背景/目的:2009 年,美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)发布了第 7 版肝细胞癌(HCC)分期系统。我们研究了第 7 版 AJCC 分期系统作为 HCC 患者临床分期系统的预后价值。

方法

我们回顾性地应用第 6 版和第 7 版 AJCC 系统对 877 例 2004 年 1 月至 2006 年 12 月期间通过影像学诊断为 HCC 的患者进行分期,并比较 AJCC 系统与巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)系统的表现。使用线性趋势 χ(2)检验和 -2 对数似然来量化预后能力。

结果

中位年龄为 57 岁,男性居多(n=701,79.9%)。第 6 版和第 7 版 AJCC 系统相邻晚期之间的生存差异无统计学意义(第 6 版≥IIIA 期和第 7 版≥IIIB 期;均 P>0.05),尽管早期相邻阶段之间存在显著差异。第 7 版 AJCC 系统比第 6 版具有更大的预后能力(线性趋势 χ(2)检验,168.195 比 160.293;-2 对数似然,7366.347 比 7396.380),但不如 BCLC 系统(线性趋势 χ(2)检验=207.013,-2 对数似然=7320.726)。

结论

第 7 版 AJCC 分期系统为 HCC 患者提供了比第 6 版更好的预后能力,但不如 BCLC 系统。因此,对于晚期 HCC 患者,第 7 版 AJCC 分期系统的预后能力较低,应谨慎应用。

相似文献

1
Prognostic value of the 7th edition of the AJCC staging system as a clinical staging system in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.第 7 版 AJCC 分期系统作为肝癌临床分期系统的预后价值。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Nov;47(17):2568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
2
Prognostic value and clinical relevance of the 6th Edition 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma.2002年美国癌症联合委员会第6版分期系统对可切除肝细胞癌患者的预后价值及临床意义
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Oct;203(4):426-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.030. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
3
Prospective validation of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system.巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期系统的前瞻性验证
J Hepatol. 2006 Apr;44(4):723-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.12.015. Epub 2006 Jan 24.
4
Critical evaluation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): A Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results (SEER) analysis.对美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版肝细胞癌(HCC)患者分期系统的批判性评估:一项监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;117(4):644-650. doi: 10.1002/jso.24908. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
5
Outcomes of liver transplantation in 490 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: validation of a uniform staging after surgical treatment.490例肝细胞癌患者肝移植的结果:手术治疗后统一分期的验证
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):1016-27; discussion 1027-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.043.
6
Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system and survival of untreated hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B virus endemic area.巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期系统与乙型肝炎病毒流行地区未经治疗的肝细胞癌患者的生存率
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr;30(4):696-705. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12788.
7
The prognosis and survival analysis according to seven staging systems of hepatocellular carcinoma following curative resection.根治性切除术后肝细胞癌基于七种分期系统的预后及生存分析。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Nov-Dec;55(88):2140-5.
8
A comparative study of pathological staging systems in predicting recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.肝移植后预测复发性肝细胞癌的病理分期系统的比较研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(6):802-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0110-x. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
9
Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system in patients with resected esophageal carcinoma.比较第 6 版和第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统在食管癌切除患者中的应用。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;89(4):1024-31. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.01.017.
10
Validation of clinical AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of 5,613 cases from a medical center in southern Taiwan.肝细胞癌临床AJCC/UICC TNM分期系统的验证:来自台湾南部一家医学中心的5613例病例分析。
Int J Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;120(12):2650-5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22616.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a diagnostic and prognostic model for bone metastasis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based analysis.肝内胆管癌骨转移诊断和预后模型的开发与验证:一项基于人群的分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):4010-4027. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-567. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Detection of Neoplastic Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.超声造影在肝细胞癌患者中检测癌栓的作用。
Tomography. 2023 Oct 20;9(5):1976-1986. doi: 10.3390/tomography9050154.
3
Clinical features and a prognostic nomogram based on the SEER database for hepatoblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and embryonal sarcoma among children and adolescents.
基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的儿童及青少年肝母细胞瘤、肝细胞癌和胚胎性肉瘤的临床特征及预后列线图。
Transl Pediatr. 2023 Feb 28;12(2):172-184. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-679. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
4
Novel Nomograms Based on Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predict Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients After Hepatectomy.基于γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与淋巴细胞比值的新型列线图预测肝癌患者肝切除术后的预后
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2023 Feb 9;10:217-230. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S391755. eCollection 2023.
5
Trends in Incidence and Prognostic Factors of Two Subtypes of Primary Liver Cancers: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Based Population Study.原发性肝癌两种亚型的发病率和预后因素趋势:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果的人群研究。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748211051548. doi: 10.1177/10732748211051548.
6
Salvage External Beam Radiotherapy after Incomplete Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.经动脉化疗栓塞术不完全治疗后肝细胞癌的挽救性外照射放疗:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Sep 22;57(10):1000. doi: 10.3390/medicina57101000.
7
Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Prognosis and Clinical Management in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.社会经济因素对肝细胞癌患者预后和临床管理的影响。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug;32(8):667-677. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2021.20617.
8
Critical appraisal of TNM versus HKU staging system for postoperative prognostic evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma.对TNM分期系统与香港大学分期系统用于肝细胞癌术后预后评估的批判性评价。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jun;9(11):919. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7611.
9
Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 10 cm: A multi-institution long-term observational study.大于10厘米的肝细胞癌肝切除术:一项多机构长期观察性研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 May 27;13(5):476-492. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i5.476.
10
Bioinformatics Analysis of the SIRT Family Members and Assessment of Their Potential Clinical Value.SIRT家族成员的生物信息学分析及其潜在临床价值评估
Onco Targets Ther. 2021 Apr 15;14:2635-2649. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S298616. eCollection 2021.