Romanò Carlo Luca, Romanò Delia, Logoluso Nicola, Drago Lorenzo
Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2011 May;1(6):207-217. doi: 10.1007/s12570-011-0056-8. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
Ten currently available classifications were tested for their ability to describe a continuous cohort of 300 adult patients affected by bone and joint infections. Each classification only focused, on the average, on 1.3 ± 0.4 features of a single clinical condition (osteomyelitis, implant-related infections, or septic arthritis), being able to classify 34.8 ± 24.7% of the patients, while a comprehensive classification system could describe all the patients considered in the study. RESULT AND CONCLUSION: A comprehensive classification system permits more accurate classification of bone and joint infections in adults than any single classification available and may serve for didactic, scientific, and clinical purposes.
对目前可用的十种分类方法进行了测试,以评估它们描述300例患有骨与关节感染的成年患者连续队列的能力。每种分类方法平均仅关注单一临床病症(骨髓炎、植入物相关感染或化脓性关节炎)的1.3±0.4个特征,能够对34.8±24.7%的患者进行分类,而一个综合分类系统可以描述该研究中考虑的所有患者。结果与结论:与任何现有的单一分类方法相比,一个综合分类系统能更准确地对成人骨与关节感染进行分类,并且可用于教学、科学和临床目的。