Chaney Sarah
Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine, University College London, 183 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE, UK.
J Med Humanit. 2011 Dec;32(4):279-89. doi: 10.1007/s10912-011-9152-6.
This paper suggests that late nineteenth-century definitions of self-mutilation, a new category of psychiatric symptomatology, were heavily influenced by the use of self-injury as a rhetorical device in the novel, for the literary text held a high status in Victorian psychology. In exploring Dimmesdale's "self-mutilation" in The Scarlet Letter in conjunction with psychiatric case histories, the paper indicates a number of common techniques and themes in literary and psychiatric texts. As well as illuminating key elements of nineteenth-century conceptions of the self, and the relation of mind and body through ideas of madness, this exploration also serves to highlight the social commentary implicit in many Victorian medical texts. Late nineteenth-century England, like mid-century New England, required the individual to help himself and, simultaneously, others; personal charity and individual philanthropy were encouraged, while state intervention was often presented as dubious. In both novel and psychiatric text, self-mutilation is thus presented as the ultimate act of selfish preoccupation, particularly in cases on the "borderlands" of insanity.
本文认为,19世纪晚期对自残(一种新的精神症状类别)的定义,在很大程度上受到小说中自我伤害作为一种修辞手段的运用的影响,因为文学文本在维多利亚时代心理学中具有很高的地位。在结合精神病史探讨《红字》中丁梅斯代尔的“自残”时,本文指出了文学文本和精神科文本中的一些共同技巧和主题。通过疯狂的观念,这种探索不仅阐明了19世纪自我概念的关键要素以及身心关系,还凸显了许多维多利亚时代医学文本中隐含的社会评论。19世纪晚期的英国,如同19世纪中叶的新英格兰一样,要求个人自助,同时也要帮助他人;鼓励个人慈善和个人慈善行为,而国家干预往往被认为是可疑的。因此,在小说和精神科文本中,自残都被视为自私自利的终极行为,尤其是在精神错乱“边缘地带”的案例中。