CLAHRC-NDL, The University of Nottingham, School of Community Health Sciences, Sir Colin Campbell Building, Jubilee campus, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 12;11:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-131.
Several computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) packages are now available to treat mild to moderate depression with or without anxiety. These have been usually been reviewed alongside cCBT for a wide range of psychological problems. Here, we single out the results of these reviews for the most common mental disorder, mild to moderate depression. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the quality of existing reviews and to enable reliable comparisons of alternative computer packages for the same patient group.
A thorough search and analysis of reviews of efficacy of cCBT published between 1999 and February 2011.
The search yielded twelve systematic reviews from ten studies covering depression. Their methodology is appraised and selected findings are presented here.
The meta-review supports the efficacy of cCBT for treatment of depression; however there is limited information on different approaches, whose relative cost-effectiveness remains to be demonstrated. Suggestions are made for future studies in the field.
目前有几个计算机化认知行为疗法 (cCBT) 包可用于治疗轻度至中度抑郁，无论是否伴有焦虑。这些通常与针对广泛心理问题的 cCBT 一起进行审查。在这里，我们仅为最常见的精神障碍，即轻度至中度抑郁，挑出这些综述的结果。本文的目的是评估现有综述的质量，并能够对同一患者群体的不同计算机包进行可靠比较。
对 1999 年至 2011 年 2 月期间发表的 cCBT 疗效的综述进行了彻底的搜索和分析。
搜索结果从十项研究中得出了十二个系统综述，涵盖了抑郁。评估了它们的方法学，并在此介绍了选定的发现。
元综述支持 cCBT 治疗抑郁症的疗效；但是，关于不同方法的信息有限，其相对成本效益仍有待证明。为该领域的未来研究提出了建议。
