• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硼替佐米的理想小瓶规格:巴西多发性骨髓瘤治疗中减少浪费和降低成本的真实数据。

Ideal vial size for bortezomib: real-world data on waste and cost reduction in treatment of multiple myeloma in Brazil.

机构信息

Evidências, Campinas, Brazil.

出版信息

Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5 Suppl 1):S82-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.013
PMID:21839906
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Single-size vials of drugs may be a source of waste and increase in treatment costs. Bortezomib, indicated for multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, is available in 3.5-mg vials, a quantity higher than the average dose commonly prescribed. This analysis aimed to demonstrate, through real-world data, which would be the optimal vial presentation for bortezomib in Brazil and quantify the reduction in medication waste related to this option.

METHODS

From November 2007 to October 2009 all patients with MM treated with bortezomib were identified via the Evidências database. Analysis of prescribed, dispensed, and wasted doses, their costs and projections of the ideal vial size were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (mean body surface area of 1.73 m(2)) received 509 infusions in 131 cycles of treatment (average of 3.77 cycles per patient). The average dose prescribed was 2.1 mg per infusion (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97-2.26) with average waste of 39.5% of the vial content (95% CI 35.35-43.76). The mean waste per patient per day was 1.38 mg (95% CI 1.24-1.52). If a 3-mg vial were available, the average drug waste per patient per day would be 0.88 mg (95% CI 0.74-1.03) or 36.2% less. With a 2.5-mg vial the waste would be 1.05 mg (95% CI 0.81-1.29) or 23.9% less. If two presentations were available (2.5 mg and 0.5 mg), the waste would be 0.52 mg (95% CI 0.4-0.63) or 62.5% less. Considering the price of the different vials to be proportional to the original 3.5-mg vial, the cost would be also reduced by the same rates described above.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple adjustment in vial size may reduce the waste of bortezomib by 36% to 62% and can also reduce the cost of treatment.

摘要

目的

单剂量小瓶的药物可能是造成浪费和增加治疗成本的原因。硼替佐米用于多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的治疗,其 3.5mg 小瓶的供应量高于常用处方的平均剂量。本分析旨在通过真实世界的数据证明硼替佐米在巴西的最佳小瓶剂型,并量化与该选择相关的药物浪费减少量。

方法

从 2007 年 11 月至 2009 年 10 月,通过 Evidências 数据库确定所有接受硼替佐米治疗的 MM 患者。对规定剂量、分发剂量和浪费剂量及其成本进行分析,并对理想小瓶大小进行预测。

结果

35 名患者(平均体表面积为 1.73m²)接受了 509 次输液,共进行了 131 个周期的治疗(平均每个患者 3.77 个周期)。规定的平均剂量为每次输注 2.1mg(95%置信区间[CI]为 1.97-2.26),平均浪费小瓶内容物的 39.5%(95%CI 为 35.35-43.76)。每位患者每天的平均浪费量为 1.38mg(95%CI 为 1.24-1.52)。如果有 3mg 的小瓶,每位患者每天的平均药物浪费量将为 0.88mg(95%CI 为 0.74-1.03),即减少 36.2%。如果使用 2.5mg 的小瓶,浪费量将为 1.05mg(95%CI 为 0.81-1.29),即减少 23.9%。如果有两种剂型(2.5mg 和 0.5mg),浪费量将为 0.52mg(95%CI 为 0.4-0.63),即减少 62.5%。考虑到不同小瓶的价格与原始 3.5mg 小瓶成正比,成本也将按上述相同比例降低。

结论

小瓶尺寸的简单调整可将硼替佐米的浪费减少 36%至 62%,同时也可降低治疗成本。

相似文献

1
Ideal vial size for bortezomib: real-world data on waste and cost reduction in treatment of multiple myeloma in Brazil.硼替佐米的理想小瓶规格:巴西多发性骨髓瘤治疗中减少浪费和降低成本的真实数据。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5 Suppl 1):S82-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.013.
2
Management of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in French hospitals and estimation of associated direct costs: a multi-centre retrospective cohort study.法国医院复发性或难治性多发性骨髓瘤的治疗管理及相关直接费用评估:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011 Feb;36(1):19-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01153.x.
3
Bortezomib in multiple myeloma.硼替佐米用于多发性骨髓瘤治疗
N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 22;353(12):1297-8; author reply 1297-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc051943.
4
Policymaker, please consider your needs carefully: does outcomes research in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma reduce policymaker uncertainty regarding value for money of bortezomib?决策者,请仔细考虑您的需求:复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤的结局研究是否减少了决策者对硼替佐米性价比的不确定性?
Value Health. 2014 Mar;17(2):245-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.12.009.
5
Cost-effectiveness of novel relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma therapies in Norway: lenalidomide plus dexamethasone vs bortezomib.挪威新型复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤治疗方案的成本效益分析:来那度胺联合地塞米松对比硼替佐米。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(6):690-7. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.611841. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
6
Drug pricing: No cure, no cost.药品定价:不治不收费。
BMJ. 2007 Jul 21;335(7611):122-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39267.432153.94.
7
Bortezomib: a novel chemotherapeutic agent for hematologic malignancies.硼替佐米:一种用于血液系统恶性肿瘤的新型化疗药物。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Jul 1;65(13):1221-31. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070272.
8
Real-world health care costs of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during the era of novel cancer agents.新型抗肿瘤药物时代复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的真实世界医疗成本。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013 Feb;38(1):41-7. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12020. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
9
Bortezomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients.硼替佐米用于治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jun;13 Suppl 1:29-33. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl1/05.
10
The cost-effectiveness of bortezomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Swedish perspective.硼替佐米治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的成本效益:瑞典视角。
Eur J Haematol. 2010 Dec;85(6):484-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2010.01526.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A real-word survey of anticancer drug wastage in a public chemotherapy center in the west of Iran.伊朗西部一家公共化疗中心抗癌药物浪费情况的真实世界调查。
Caspian J Intern Med. 2025 Mar 21;16(2):314-319. doi: 10.22088/cjim.16.2.314. eCollection 2025 Spring.
2
Ideal Vial Size for Infliximab in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Analysis of Pharmaceutical Waste and Physician Opinions.英夫利昔单抗治疗炎症性肠病的理想药瓶规格:药物浪费及医生观点分析
Crohns Colitis 360. 2021 Oct 7;3(4):otab071. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otab071. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Cost-effectiveness of adding daratumumab or bortezomib to lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
来那度胺联合地塞米松添加达雷妥尤单抗或硼替佐米治疗新诊断多发性骨髓瘤的成本效果分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Dec;27(12):1691-1702. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.12.1691.
4
Estimating the effect of optimizing anticancer drug vials on medical costs in Japan based on the data from a cancer hospital.基于癌症医院的数据估计优化抗癌药物小瓶对日本医疗费用的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):1017. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05822-1.
5
A Cost Saving and Waste Minimization Study About Handling of the Antineoplastic Agents.一项关于抗肿瘤药物处理的成本节约与废物最小化研究。
Turk J Pharm Sci. 2017 Dec;14(3):304-310. doi: 10.4274/tjps.25238. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
Cost reduction as a result of bortezomib vial sharing in the University Hospital Center 'Mother Theresa' Tirana.地拉那“特蕾莎修女”大学医院中心通过硼替佐米瓶共享实现成本降低。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Jul;26(4):239-240. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001676. Epub 2018 Jul 24.