Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Associates, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;37(10):1756-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.032. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
To determine whether the use of an eye-surgery simulator during ophthalmology residency training improves cataract surgery performance.
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Associates, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Comparative case series.
Residents were divided into a simulator group and a nonsimulator group based on the inclusion or absence of the eye-surgery simulator in residency training. Consecutive resident cataract surgeries with the same attending surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. The phaco time and percentage power and intraoperative complications in each case were recorded. The adjusted phaco time in each case was calculated.
The study reviewed 592 surgeries. The mean values for phaco time, percentage phaco power, adjusted phaco time, complication rates, and complication grade were 1.88 minutes (range 0.11 to 7.20 minutes), 25.32% (range 2.2% to 50.0%), 47.58 minutes (range 0.24 to 280.80 minutes), 0.04, and 2.33, respectively, in the simulator group (n = 17) and 2.41 minutes (range 0.04 to 8.33 minutes), 28.19% (range 8.0% to 70.0%), 71.85 minutes (range 0.32 to 583.10 minutes), 0.06, and 2.47, respectively, in the nonsimulator group (n = 25). The Student t tests showed a statistically significant between-group difference in mean phaco time (P<.002), adjusted phaco time (P<.0001), and percentage phaco power (P<.0001). Regression analysis showed a significantly steeper slope of improvement in mean phaco time and power in the nonsimulator group than in the simulator group (P<.0001).
Residents who trained using the simulator had shorter phaco times, lower percentage powers, fewer intraoperative complications, and a shorter learning curve.
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
确定在眼科住院医师培训中使用眼外科模拟器是否能提高白内障手术的效果。
美国华盛顿特区乔治华盛顿大学医学协会眼科系。
对比病例系列。
根据住院医师培训中是否使用眼外科模拟器,将住院医师分为模拟器组和非模拟器组。回顾性分析同一位主治医生的连续住院医师白内障手术。记录每个病例的超声乳化时间和功率百分比以及术中并发症。计算每个病例的调整超声乳化时间。
本研究共回顾了 592 例手术。模拟器组(n = 17)的超声乳化时间、超声乳化功率百分比、调整超声乳化时间、并发症发生率和并发症等级的平均值分别为 1.88 分钟(范围 0.11 至 7.20 分钟)、25.32%(范围 2.2%至 50.0%)、47.58 分钟(范围 0.24 至 280.80 分钟)、0.04 和 2.33;非模拟器组(n = 25)的超声乳化时间、超声乳化功率百分比、调整超声乳化时间、并发症发生率和并发症等级的平均值分别为 2.41 分钟(范围 0.04 至 8.33 分钟)、28.19%(范围 8.0%至 70.0%)、71.85 分钟(范围 0.32 至 583.10 分钟)、0.06 和 2.47。学生 t 检验显示,两组间平均超声乳化时间(P<.002)、调整超声乳化时间(P<.0001)和超声乳化功率百分比(P<.0001)存在统计学显著差异。回归分析显示,非模拟器组的平均超声乳化时间和功率的改善斜率明显大于模拟器组(P<.0001)。
使用模拟器培训的住院医师超声乳化时间更短,功率百分比更低,术中并发症更少,学习曲线更短。