Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University Hospital Cancer Center, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry, USA.
Curr Opin Immunol. 2011 Oct;23(5):583-90. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
For decades, type I IFNs have been considered indispensable and unique antiviral mediators for the activation of rapid innate antiviral protection. However, the recent discovery of type III IFNs is challenging this paradigm. Since their identification in 2002/2003 by two independent groups, type III IFNs or IFN-λs, also known as IL-28/29, have been the subject of increased study with consequent recognition of their importance in virology and immunology. Initial reports suggested that IFN-λs functionally resemble type I IFNs. Although IFN-λs and classical type I IFNs (IFN-α/β) utilize distinct receptor complexes for signaling, both types of IFNs activate similar intracellular signaling pathways and biological activities, including the ability to induce antiviral state in cells, and both type I and type III IFNs are induced by viral infection. However, different antiviral potency, pattern of their induction and differential tissue expression of their corresponding receptor subunits suggest that the type I and type III IFN antiviral systems do not merely duplicate each other. Recent studies have started to reveal unique biological activities of IFN-λs in and beyond innate antiviral immunity.
几十年来,I 型干扰素一直被认为是激活快速先天抗病毒保护所必需且独特的抗病毒介质。然而,III 型干扰素的最近发现挑战了这一范式。自 2002/2003 年两个独立小组鉴定以来,III 型干扰素或 IFN-λ,也称为 IL-28/29,一直是研究的重点,因此认识到它们在病毒学和免疫学中的重要性。最初的报告表明,IFN-λ 在功能上类似于 I 型干扰素。尽管 IFN-λ 和经典的 I 型干扰素(IFN-α/β)利用不同的受体复合物进行信号转导,但这两种类型的干扰素都激活相似的细胞内信号通路和生物学活性,包括诱导细胞抗病毒状态的能力,I 型和 III 型干扰素都可被病毒感染诱导。然而,不同的抗病毒效力、诱导模式以及其相应受体亚基的组织表达差异表明,I 型和 III 型 IFN 抗病毒系统并不仅仅是相互复制。最近的研究开始揭示 IFN-λ 在先天抗病毒免疫内外的独特生物学活性。