Piette John D, Valenstein Marcia, Himle Joseph, Duffy Sonia, Torres Trissa, Vogel Mark, Richardson Caroline
Ann Arbor VA Healthcare System, HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Chronic Illn. 2011 Dec;7(4):267-78. doi: 10.1177/1742395311409259. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
In a trial completed in 2010, US patients with diabetes and depression were randomized to usual care or telephone cognitive behavioural therapy that emphasized physical activity. Twelve-month intervention effects were observed for blood pressure, depression, and pedometer-measured step-counts. This study examined variation in intervention effects across patient subgroups defined by a measure of clinical complexity.
Three groups of patients were identified at baseline using the Vector Model of Complexity that recognizes socioeconomic, biological, behavioural, and other determinants of treatment response. Complexity-by-intervention interactions were examined using regression models.
Intervention effects for blood pressure, depression, and step-counts differed across complexity levels (each p < 0.01). Effects on Beck Depression Inventory scores were greater in the low-complexity group (-8.8) than in the medium- (-3.2) or high-complexity groups (-2.7). Physical activity effects also were greatest in the low-complexity group (increase of 1498 steps per day). In contrast, systolic blood pressure effects were greater among intervention patients with high complexity (-8.5 mmHg).
This intervention had varying impacts on physical and mental health depending on patients' clinical complexity. Physical activity and depressive symptom gains may be more likely among less complex patients, although more complex patients may achieve cardiovascular benefits through decreased blood pressures.
在一项2010年完成的试验中,患有糖尿病和抑郁症的美国患者被随机分配至常规护理组或强调身体活动的电话认知行为治疗组。观察到该干预措施对血压、抑郁及计步器测量的步数在12个月时产生了效果。本研究考察了由临床复杂性测量所定义的患者亚组间干预效果的差异。
在基线时使用复杂性向量模型识别出三组患者,该模型认可社会经济、生物学、行为学及其他治疗反应的决定因素。使用回归模型检验复杂性与干预之间的相互作用。
血压、抑郁及步数的干预效果在不同复杂性水平间存在差异(各p<0.01)。低复杂性组对贝克抑郁量表评分的影响更大(-8.8),高于中等复杂性组(-3.2)及高复杂性组(-2.7)。身体活动效果在低复杂性组也最为显著(每天增加1498步)。相比之下,高复杂性的干预患者收缩压效果更大(-8.5mmHg)。
该干预措施对身心健康的影响因患者的临床复杂性而异。身体活动及抑郁症状改善可能在复杂性较低的患者中更易出现,尽管复杂性较高的患者可能通过降低血压获得心血管方面的益处。