Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):776-81.
According to the so-called All-on-Four protocol, four dental implants are placed in the interforaminal region of the edentulous mandible to support full-arch fixed prostheses. In this design, the posterior implants are tilted distally to a maximum of 45 degrees. The purpose of this finite element study was to evaluate the stress concentration in peri-implant bone during two loading conditions and to compare this design with another design in which the four implants are placed parallel to each other and perpendicular to the occlusal plane.
Three-dimensional finite element models consisted of mandibular bone, four dental implants inserted in two different configurations-with the distal implants tilted (model A) or four parallel implants (model S)-and hybrid superstructures. Two loading conditions (178 N/central incisors or 300 N/left first molar) were considered, and von Mises stress values were determined.
During anterior loading, higher stress concentrations were detected in the peri-implant bone of all four implants in model A. During posterior loading, lower stress concentrations were observed around the anterior implants of model A; however, the tilted posterior implants were subjected to higher stresses in every condition.
Application of either of these designs was successful in reducing peri-implant stress in one loading condition. However, neither design demonstrated better performance in both loading conditions; therefore, within the limitations of this study, neither design demonstrated clearly superior performance.
根据所谓的“All-on-Four 方案”,在无牙下颌的眶下区域放置四颗种植体以支撑全口固定义齿。在这种设计中,后牙种植体向远中倾斜最大可达 45 度。本有限元研究的目的是评估两种加载条件下种植体周围骨的应力集中情况,并将这种设计与另一种设计进行比较,后者将四颗种植体彼此平行且垂直于咬合面放置。
三维有限元模型由下颌骨、以两种不同配置(后牙种植体倾斜[模型 A]或四颗平行种植体[模型 S])插入的四颗牙种植体以及混合上部结构组成。考虑了两种加载条件(178 N/中切牙或 300 N/左侧第一磨牙),并确定了 von Mises 应力值。
在前部加载时,模型 A 中所有四个种植体周围的种植体骨中检测到更高的应力集中。在后部加载时,模型 A 中前牙种植体周围观察到较低的应力集中;然而,倾斜的后牙种植体在每种情况下都承受更高的应力。
这两种设计中的任何一种都成功地降低了一种加载条件下的种植体周围的应力。然而,在两种加载条件下,没有一种设计表现出更好的性能;因此,在本研究的限制范围内,没有一种设计表现出明显优越的性能。