Department of Psychology, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY 42101, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jan;38(1):102-17. doi: 10.1037/a0024851. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
In a 2-stage causal learning task, young and older participants first learned which foods presented in compound were followed by an allergic reaction (e.g., STEAK-BEANS→ REACTION) and then the causal efficacy of 1 food from these compounds was revalued (e.g., BEANS→ NO REACTION). In Experiment 1, unrelated food pairs were used, and although there were no age differences in compound- or single-cue-outcome learning, older adults did not retrospectively revalue the causal efficacy of the absent target cues (e.g., STEAK). However, they had weaker within-compound associations for the unrelated foods, and this may have prevented them from retrieving the representations of these cues. In Experiment 2, older adults still showed no retrospective revaluation of absent cues even though compound food cues with pre-existing associations were used (e.g., STEAK-POTATO), and they received additional learning trials. Finally, in Experiment 3, older adults revalued the causal efficacy of the target cues when small, unobtrusive icons of these cues were present during single-cue revaluation. These findings suggest that age-related deficits in causal learning for absent cues are due to ineffective associative binding and reactivation processes.
在一个两阶段因果学习任务中,年轻和年长的参与者首先学习了哪些食物在组合中出现会引起过敏反应(例如,牛排-豆→反应),然后重新评估了这些化合物中一种食物的因果效力(例如,豆→无反应)。在实验 1 中,使用了不相关的食物对,尽管在复合或单线索结果学习中没有年龄差异,但老年人不会回溯性地重新评估缺失目标线索的因果效力(例如,牛排)。然而,他们对不相关食物的复合内关联较弱,这可能使他们无法检索这些线索的表示。在实验 2 中,即使使用了具有预先存在关联的复合食物线索(例如,牛排-土豆),老年人仍然没有显示出对缺失线索的回溯性重新评估,并且他们接受了额外的学习试验。最后,在实验 3 中,当这些线索的小、不显眼的图标在单线索重新评估期间存在时,老年人重新评估了目标线索的因果效力。这些发现表明,与年龄相关的缺失线索因果学习缺陷是由于关联绑定和重新激活过程无效所致。