• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联想学习的选择性:用于解释阻断和线索竞争现象的认知阶段框架。

Selectivity in associative learning: a cognitive stage framework for blocking and cue competition phenomena.

机构信息

Centre for the Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven Belgium.

Centre for the Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven Belgium ; University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 12;5:1305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01305. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01305
PMID:25429280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4228836/
Abstract

BLOCKING IS THE MOST IMPORTANT PHENOMENON IN THE HISTORY OF ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING THEORY

for over 40 years, blocking has inspired a whole generation of learning models. Blocking is part of a family of effects that are typically termed "cue competition" effects. Common amongst all cue competition effects is that a cue-outcome relation is poorly learned or poorly expressed because the cue is trained in the presence of an alternative predictor or cause of the outcome. We provide an overview of the cognitive processes involved in cue competition effects in humans and propose a stage framework that brings these processes together. The framework contends that the behavioral display of cue competition is cognitively construed following three stages that include (1) an encoding stage, (2) a retention stage, and (3) a performance stage. We argue that the stage framework supports a comprehensive understanding of cue competition effects.

摘要

阻断是联想学习理论史上最重要的现象

40 多年来,阻断激发了整整一代学习模型。阻断是通常被称为“线索竞争”效应的一类效应的一部分。所有线索竞争效应的共同点是,由于线索是在替代的预测器或结果的原因存在的情况下进行训练的,因此线索-结果关系学习得很差或表达得很差。我们提供了人类线索竞争效应所涉及的认知过程的概述,并提出了一个将这些过程结合在一起的阶段框架。该框架认为,线索竞争的行为表现是在经历三个阶段后在认知上构建的,包括(1)编码阶段,(2)保持阶段,和(3)表现阶段。我们认为,该阶段框架支持对线索竞争效应的全面理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7440/4228836/0d67e5ffc607/fpsyg-05-01305-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7440/4228836/0d67e5ffc607/fpsyg-05-01305-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7440/4228836/0d67e5ffc607/fpsyg-05-01305-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Selectivity in associative learning: a cognitive stage framework for blocking and cue competition phenomena.联想学习的选择性:用于解释阻断和线索竞争现象的认知阶段框架。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 12;5:1305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01305. eCollection 2014.
2
Blocking is not 'pure' cue competition: Renewal-like effects in forward and backward blocking indicate contributions by associative cue interference.阻断并非“纯粹”的线索竞争:前向和后向阻断中的类似更新效应表明联想线索干扰的贡献。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022 Apr;48(2):145-159. doi: 10.1037/xan0000315. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
3
Behavioral determinants in the expression of the Kamin blocking effect: Implications for associative learning theory.行为决定因素在卡明阻断效应的表达:对联想学习理论的启示。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 May;124:16-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.01.016. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
4
Theory protection: Do humans protect existing associative links?理论保护:人类是否保护现有的联想联系?
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022 Jan;48(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/xan0000314.
5
Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.前向和后向阻断设计中线索竞争的不对称性:因果模型理论的进一步证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Mar;60(3):387-99. doi: 10.1080/17470210601000839.
6
Associations and propositions: the case for a dual-process account of learning in humans.关联与命题:人类学习的双过程理论依据
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Feb;108:185-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
7
Cue competition in evaluative conditioning as a function of the learning process.作为学习过程函数的评价性条件作用中的线索竞争。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Nov;162:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
8
How competitive is cue competition?线索竞争的竞争力如何?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jan;73(1):104-114. doi: 10.1177/1747021819866967. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
9
Associative interference between cues and between outcomes presented together and presented apart: an integration.同时呈现和分开呈现的线索之间以及结果之间的关联性干扰:一种整合。
Behav Processes. 2002 Apr 28;57(2-3):163-185. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00012-8.
10
Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition.因果模型中的预测性和诊断性学习:线索竞争中的不对称性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992 Jun;121(2):222-36. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.121.2.222.

引用本文的文献

1
Pavlovian safety learning: An integrative theoretical review.巴甫洛夫式安全学习:一项综合性理论综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):176-202. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02559-4. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
2
Forward and backward blocking in statistical learning.统计学习中的前向和后向阻断。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 5;19(8):e0306797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306797. eCollection 2024.
3
Three Ways That Non-associative Knowledge May Affect Associative Learning Processes.非联想性知识可能影响联想学习过程的三种方式。

本文引用的文献

1
Much Pain, Little Gain? Paradigm-Specific Models and Methods in Experimental Psychology.多痛苦,少收获?实验心理学中的范式特异性模型和方法。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;6(2):183-91. doi: 10.1177/1745691611400241.
2
Attention as an acquisition and performance variable (AAPV).作为一种习得与表现变量的注意力(AAPV)。
Learn Behav. 2014 Jun;42(2):105-22. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0131-9.
3
Failure to observe renewal following retrieval-induced forgetting.检索诱导遗忘后未能观察到恢复。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 27;7:2024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02024. eCollection 2016.
4
Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced.因果关系错觉:它们如何影响我们的日常思维以及如何减少这些错觉
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 2;6:888. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00888. eCollection 2015.
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
4
Associations and propositions: the case for a dual-process account of learning in humans.关联与命题:人类学习的双过程理论依据
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Feb;108:185-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
5
Blocking in rats, humans and snails using a within-subjects design.采用被试内设计在大鼠、人类和蜗牛中进行阻断。
Behav Processes. 2013 Nov;100:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.07.014. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
6
Learned predictiveness influences rapid attentional capture: evidence from the dot probe task.学习预测性影响快速注意力捕获:来自点探测任务的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1888-900. doi: 10.1037/a0033700. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
7
A causal link between prediction errors, dopamine neurons and learning.预测误差、多巴胺神经元和学习之间的因果关系。
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Jul;16(7):966-73. doi: 10.1038/nn.3413. Epub 2013 May 26.
8
Blocking in children's causal learning depends on working memory and reasoning abilities.阻断儿童的因果学习取决于工作记忆和推理能力。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Jul;115(3):562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.016. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
9
What is learning? On the nature and merits of a functional definition of learning.学习是什么?关于学习的功能定义的本质和优点。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):631-42. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0386-3.
10
The prelimbic cortex contributes to the down-regulation of attention toward redundant cues.前额皮质有助于降低对冗余线索的注意力。
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Apr;24(4):1066-74. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs393. Epub 2012 Dec 12.