• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用新改良侧卧位体外冲击波碎石术治疗肥胖患者肾结石的可行性及疗效

Feasibility and efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy using a new modified lateral position for the treatment of renal stones in obese patients.

作者信息

Karatzas Anastasios, Gravas Stavros, Tzortzis Vassilios, Aravantinos Evangelos, Zachos Ioannis, Kalogeras Nikolaos, Melekos Michael

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Mezourlo, 41110 Larissa, Greece.

出版信息

Urol Res. 2012 Aug;40(4):355-9. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0416-4. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-011-0416-4
PMID:21847555
Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESWL using a modified lateral position in obese patients with renal stones. Nineteen obese patients with renal stones were enrolled (group A). The mean stone diameter was 1.3 cm (0.7-1.9 cm). The mean BMI was 35.1 kg/m² (31-41 kg/m²). Patients were placed in the lateral position, with the energy source facing their body posteriorly and the site where the stone was located in direct contact with the water cushion. Success rate (defined as the percentage of patients who were stone-free or with insignificant fragments after 3 months), mean number of ESWL sessions, mean duration of ESWL session and complications were recorded. The results were compared with those of 17 obese patients (Group B) with similar baseline characteristics treated in the standard supine position. All ESWLs were performed using the Dornier lithotripter SII. Both success rate (68.4 vs. 64.7% for groups A and B, respectively) and mean number of sessions (2.2 vs. 2.6) did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.5). Interestingly, the time required to complete ESWL was significantly shorter for group A patients (56 min) compared to group B (73 min) (p = 0.001). No severe complications (including hematoma, pyelonephritis) were recorded. Our data indicate that ESWL in the modified lateral position for renal calculi in obese patients seems to be feasible and safe. In addition, it is faster than in the supine position since it overcomes technical difficulties. Further studies with a large number of patients are required to support our findings.

摘要

我们研究的目的是评估在肥胖肾结石患者中采用改良侧卧位进行体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的疗效和安全性。纳入了19例肥胖肾结石患者(A组)。结石平均直径为1.3 cm(0.7 - 1.9 cm)。平均体重指数(BMI)为35.1 kg/m²(31 - 41 kg/m²)。患者取侧卧位,能量源朝向其身体后方,结石所在部位与水垫直接接触。记录成功率(定义为3个月后结石清除或残留微小碎片的患者百分比)、ESWL治疗次数、每次ESWL治疗的平均时长以及并发症情况。将结果与17例采用标准仰卧位治疗的具有相似基线特征的肥胖患者(B组)进行比较。所有ESWL均使用多尼尔SII型碎石机进行。两组的成功率(A组和B组分别为68.4%和64.7%)和平均治疗次数(2.2次和2.6次)差异均无统计学意义(p = 0.5)。有趣的是,A组患者完成ESWL所需时间(56分钟)明显短于B组(73分钟)(p = 0.001)。未记录到严重并发症(包括血肿、肾盂肾炎)。我们的数据表明,肥胖患者肾结石采用改良侧卧位进行ESWL似乎是可行且安全的。此外,由于克服了技术困难,其比仰卧位更快。需要大量患者的进一步研究来支持我们的发现。

相似文献

1
Feasibility and efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy using a new modified lateral position for the treatment of renal stones in obese patients.采用新改良侧卧位体外冲击波碎石术治疗肥胖患者肾结石的可行性及疗效
Urol Res. 2012 Aug;40(4):355-9. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0416-4. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal pelvicalyceal stones in morbidly obese patients.体外冲击波碎石术治疗病态肥胖患者肾盂肾盏结石
Int Braz J Urol. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):105-10. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382005000200003.
3
A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.一种用于治疗尿路结石的新型便携式冲击波碎石机:双焦点碎石机的单中心经验
BJU Int. 2007 Nov;100(5):1137-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07039.x. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
4
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy monotherapy in renal pelvic ectopia.
Urology. 1996 Dec;48(6):857-61. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00316-0.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large renal stones. To what size is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy alone feasible?体外冲击波碎石术治疗大型肾结石。单纯体外冲击波碎石术可行的结石最大尺寸是多少?
Eur Urol. 1988;15(1-2):5-8. doi: 10.1159/000473384.
6
Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗肾结石成功的预后因素。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;38(1):63-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-005-3155-z.
7
[NEW OPTIONS OF ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT FOR KIDNEY AND URETER STONES IN OBESE PATIENTS].[肥胖患者肾脏和输尿管结石的内镜治疗新选择]
Urologiia. 2015 Jul-Aug(4):55-62.
8
Role of alpha-1 blocker in expulsion of stone fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones.α-1阻滞剂在肾结石体外冲击波碎石术后结石碎片排出中的作用。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011 Apr-Jun;23(2):125-9.
9
The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi.体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立性下盏结石与孤立性中、上盏结石的疗效比较。
J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2081-4; discussion 2085. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65509-7.
10
[Monotherapy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral stones].体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾及输尿管结石的单一疗法
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1992 Oct;83(10):1586-92. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.83.1586.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of an artificial neural network in the evaluation of the extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy as a treatment of choice for urinary lithiasis.人工神经网络在评估体外冲击波碎石术作为尿路结石首选治疗方法中的应用。
Asian J Urol. 2022 Apr;9(2):132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
2
OBESITY: A DELICATE ISSUE CHOOSING THE ESWL TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH KIDNEY AND URETERAL STONES?肥胖:一个微妙的问题 为肾和输尿管结石患者选择体外冲击波碎石术治疗?
Acta Endocrinol (Buchar). 2019 Jan-Mar;-5(1):133-138. doi: 10.4183/aeb.2019.133.
3
Effect of urine pH on the effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy: A pilot study.

本文引用的文献

1
Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy.皮肤至结石距离是冲击波碎石术后结石清除状态的独立预测指标。
J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1383-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0394.
2
Analgesia during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: fentanyl citrate versus parecoxib sodium.体外冲击波碎石术中的镇痛:枸橼酸芬太尼与帕瑞昔布钠的比较
J Endourol. 2008 Apr;22(4):623-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0344.
3
Outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: effect of body mass index.经皮肾镜取石术的结果:体重指数的影响
尿液pH值对冲击波碎石术疗效的影响:一项初步研究。
Urol Ann. 2016 Jul-Sep;8(3):286-90. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.184899.
4
Noncontrast computed tomography can predict the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy via accurate stone measurement and abdominal fat distribution determination.非增强计算机断层扫描可通过精确的结石测量和腹部脂肪分布测定来预测冲击波碎石术的结果。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015 Jan;31(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.049. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
4
Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.通过计算机断层扫描上的皮肤到结石距离确定冲击波碎石术的成功率。
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):941-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.011.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal pelvicalyceal stones in morbidly obese patients.体外冲击波碎石术治疗病态肥胖患者肾盂肾盏结石
Int Braz J Urol. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):105-10. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382005000200003.
6
Urolithiasis and obesity: metabolic and technical considerations.尿路结石与肥胖:代谢及技术方面的考量
Curr Opin Urol. 2005 Mar;15(2):113-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000160626.36236.22.
7
Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones.肥胖、体重增加与肾结石风险
JAMA. 2005 Jan 26;293(4):455-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.4.455.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield units.基于体重指数和亨氏单位的体外冲击波碎石术成功率
Urology. 2005 Jan;65(1):33-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.08.004.
9
Percutaneous stone surgery in the obese: outcome stratified according to body mass index.肥胖患者的经皮结石手术:根据体重指数分层的结果
BJU Int. 2004 Jun;93(9):1296-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04862.x.
10
Treatment of urolithiasis in the morbidly obese.病态肥胖患者尿路结石的治疗
Obes Surg. 2004 Mar;14(3):300-4. doi: 10.1381/096089204322917783.