Fisher David James
Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
Psychoanal Hist. 2004;6(1):57-74. doi: 10.3366/pah.2004.6.1.57.
After selecting five representative European psychoanalytic thinkers, all of whom emigrated to the United States, this essay surveys their earliest perceptions and interpretations of the historical and psychological roots of Fascism, with particular emphasis on anti-Semitism. My samples almost all derive from the period before, during, and immediately after World War II. In examining the writings of Otto Fenichel, Ernst Simmel, Erik Homburger Erikson, Rudolf Loewenstein and Bruno Bettelheim, it discusses the various environmental and psychological dimensions of their understandings of racial prejudice. The paper argues that each thinker attempted to integrate historical, sociological, cultural and clinical factors into their psychodynamic formulations about the individual and group mind of the Fascist anti-Semite. This generation of psychoanalysts explained Fascist anti-Semitism by exploring the mechanisms of projection, the process of massive splitting mechanisms of the group mind, fantasies of delinquent adolescent aggrandizement in Hitler, sado-masochistic and perverse oedipal dynamics, and a macabre identification with the torturers on the part of Jewish inmates in the concentration camps, that obliterated the individual's sense of autonomy and capacity to respond morally. The paper points out the pronounced ambivalence of this generation of Jewish analysts and intellectuals toward their own Jewish backgrounds and sense of themselves as Jews. It also argues that this generation muted its left-wing and socialist political tendencies once they arrived in America, taking a turn against politics. It suggests that some of the features of this Jewish ambivalence can be seen in the exploration of a so-called "Jewish psychology," itself a disguised form of racism, a derivative of projection, which may have had rather negative and authoritarian consequences for the psychoanalytic movement in America.
在挑选了五位具有代表性的欧洲精神分析思想家后(他们均移民至美国),本文考察了他们对法西斯主义的历史根源和心理根源的最初认知与解读,尤其着重于反犹主义。我的样本几乎都源自第二次世界大战之前、期间及刚结束后那段时期。在研究奥托·费尼切尔、恩斯特·西美尔、埃里克·洪伯格·埃里克森、鲁道夫·洛温斯坦和布鲁诺·贝特尔海姆的著作时,本文探讨了他们对种族偏见理解的各种环境和心理层面。论文认为,每位思想家都试图将历史、社会学、文化和临床因素融入他们关于法西斯反犹主义者个体和群体心理的精神动力学表述中。这一代精神分析学家通过探究投射机制、群体心理的大规模分裂机制过程、希特勒身上青少年犯罪式夸大的幻想、施虐受虐和变态的俄狄浦斯动力学,以及集中营里犹太囚犯对施虐者的一种可怕认同(这种认同抹杀了个体的自主感和道德回应能力)来解释法西斯反犹主义。论文指出了这一代犹太分析家和知识分子对他们自己的犹太背景以及作为犹太人的自我认知有着明显的矛盾态度。论文还认为,这一代人抵达美国后淡化了其左翼和社会主义政治倾向,转而反对政治。论文表明,这种犹太矛盾心理的一些特征可以在对一种所谓“犹太心理学”的探索中看到,这种“犹太心理学”本身就是一种伪装形式的种族主义,是投射的衍生物,可能对美国的精神分析运动产生了相当负面和独裁的影响。