Suppr超能文献

[马匹购买交易中的兽医检查]

[Veterinary examinations of horses during purchase transactions].

作者信息

Fellmer E

出版信息

Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1990 Apr 1;103(4):125-32.

PMID:2184804
Abstract

Veterinary examinations of horses on the occasion of sale or purchase take place on the basis of contracts for work and services. Three types may be distinguished: Examinations for sale (by order of the seller before the sales contract is concluded) Guarantee examination (by order of the buyer after conclusion of the sales contract) (Real) purchase examination (under a conditional contract of purchase). In the latter case the veterinarian acts as trustee for both seller and buyer and is equally obliged to both parties morally and at law. The deficiencies of the law of warranties for contracts of purchase of horses have led to the situation that more and more purchasers try to shift the risk to the veterinarian by ordering a comprehensive examination of the horse. In the light of several new court decisions the veterinarian bears a substantial risk of liability in those cases. The veterinarian is not only obliged to discover every irregularity in the health of the horse and to inform his customer accordingly; furthermore he has to inform his customer about the risks resulting from any irregularity he might have found. On the other hand the veterinarian is not obliged to make a binding prognosis of the future capabilities of the horse. The limitation period for claims of damages in case of inaccurate statements and opinions on the horse's health, which result from the veterinarian's negligence, is 30 years. The veterinarian can restrict his liability as to the limitation period and as to the maximum amount of liability. This can be done by employing standard form contracts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在马匹买卖时进行的兽医检查是基于工作和服务合同进行的。可区分出三种类型:销售检查(在销售合同缔结前由卖方委托)、保证检查(在销售合同缔结后由买方委托)、(实际)购买检查(依据有条件购买合同)。在后一种情况下,兽医同时作为买卖双方的受托人,在道德和法律上对双方负有同等义务。马匹购买合同中担保法的缺陷导致了这样一种情况,即越来越多的购买者通过要求对马匹进行全面检查,试图将风险转嫁给兽医。鉴于一些新的法院判决,在这些情况下兽医承担着很大的责任风险。兽医不仅有义务发现马匹健康方面的每一项异常并相应地告知其客户;此外,他还必须告知客户他可能发现的任何异常所带来的风险。另一方面,兽医没有义务对马匹未来的能力做出有约束力的预测。因兽医疏忽导致对马匹健康做出不准确陈述和意见而产生损害赔偿请求的诉讼时效为30年。兽医可以在诉讼时效和责任最高限额方面限制自己的责任。这可以通过使用标准格式合同来实现。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验