• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据医师专业划分的医疗事故风险。

Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 18;365(7):629-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa1012370
PMID:21848463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3204310/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data are lacking on the proportion of physicians who face malpractice claims in a year, the size of those claims, and the cumulative career malpractice risk according to specialty.

METHODS

We analyzed malpractice data from 1991 through 2005 for all physicians who were covered by a large professional liability insurer with a nationwide client base (40,916 physicians and 233,738 physician-years of coverage). For 25 specialties, we reported the proportion of physicians who had malpractice claims in a year, the proportion of claims leading to an indemnity payment (compensation paid to a plaintiff), and the size of indemnity payments. We estimated the cumulative risk of ever being sued among physicians in high- and low-risk specialties.

RESULTS

Each year during the study period, 7.4% of all physicians had a malpractice claim, with 1.6% having a claim leading to a payment (i.e., 78% of all claims did not result in payments to claimants). The proportion of physicians facing a claim each year ranged from 19.1% in neurosurgery, 18.9% in thoracic-cardiovascular surgery, and 15.3% in general surgery to 5.2% in family medicine, 3.1% in pediatrics, and 2.6% in psychiatry. The mean indemnity payment was $274,887, and the median was $111,749. Mean payments ranged from $117,832 for dermatology to $520,923 for pediatrics. It was estimated that by the age of 65 years, 75% of physicians in low-risk specialties had faced a malpractice claim, as compared with 99% of physicians in high-risk specialties.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial variation in the likelihood of malpractice suits and the size of indemnity payments across specialties. The cumulative risk of facing a malpractice claim is high in all specialties, although most claims do not lead to payments to plaintiffs. (Funded by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice and the National Institute on Aging.).

摘要

背景

缺乏关于医生在一年内面临医疗事故索赔的比例、这些索赔的规模以及根据专业划分的累积职业医疗事故风险的数据。

方法

我们分析了一家大型专业责任保险公司在 1991 年至 2005 年期间为所有医生提供的医疗事故数据,该保险公司在全国范围内拥有客户基础(40916 名医生和 233738 名医生的承保年限)。对于 25 个专业,我们报告了一年内有医疗事故索赔的医生比例、导致赔偿支付(即向原告支付的赔偿金)的索赔比例以及赔偿支付的规模。我们估计了高风险和低风险专业医生中被起诉的累积风险。

结果

在研究期间的每一年,都有 7.4%的医生有医疗事故索赔,其中 1.6%的索赔导致赔偿支付(即 78%的索赔没有向索赔人支付赔偿金)。每年面临索赔的医生比例从神经外科的 19.1%、心胸血管外科的 18.9%和普通外科的 15.3%到家庭医学的 5.2%、儿科的 3.1%和精神病学的 2.6%不等。平均赔偿支付额为 274887 美元,中位数为 111749 美元。皮肤科的平均赔偿支付额为 117832 美元,儿科的为 520923 美元。估计到 65 岁时,低风险专业的 75%的医生已经面临医疗事故索赔,而高风险专业的 99%的医生则面临这种情况。

结论

各专业之间的医疗事故诉讼可能性和赔偿支付规模存在很大差异。在所有专业中,面临医疗事故索赔的累积风险都很高,尽管大多数索赔不会导致向原告支付赔偿金。(由 RAND 公民司法研究所和美国国家老龄化研究所资助)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e00/3204310/dd9cfc003ad6/nihms320817f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e00/3204310/4b1cd4c26828/nihms320817f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e00/3204310/5410f531082e/nihms320817f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e00/3204310/bf645e009b2d/nihms320817f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e00/3204310/dd9cfc003ad6/nihms320817f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e00/3204310/4b1cd4c26828/nihms320817f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e00/3204310/5410f531082e/nihms320817f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e00/3204310/bf645e009b2d/nihms320817f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e00/3204310/dd9cfc003ad6/nihms320817f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.根据医师专业划分的医疗事故风险。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 18;365(7):629-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370.
2
An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers.一项在医师职业责任保险公司全国数据库中进行的封闭急诊室医疗事故索赔的流行病学研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 May;17(5):553-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00729.x.
3
Malpractice risk among US pediatricians.美国儿科医生的医疗事故风险。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131(6):1148-54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3443. Epub 2013 May 6.
4
High and low-risk specialties experience with the U.S. medical malpractice system.高风险和低风险专业与美国医疗事故系统的经历。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 6;13:465. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-465.
5
Determinants of brain tumor malpractice litigation outcome and indemnity payments: a 29-year nationwide analysis.脑瘤医疗事故诉讼结果和赔偿支付的决定因素:29 年全国范围分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Nov;49(5):E21. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.FOCUS20601.
6
Malpractice occurrence in emergency medicine: does residency training make a difference?急诊医学中的医疗过失事件:住院医师培训有作用吗?
J Emerg Med. 2000 Aug;19(2):99-105. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(00)00218-3.
7
Rates and Characteristics of Paid Malpractice Claims Among US Physicians by Specialty, 1992-2014.1992 - 2014年美国各专科医生医疗事故索赔付费率及特征
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):710-718. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0311.
8
Medical Malpractice Involving Pulmonary/Critical Care Physicians.涉及肺科/危重病科医生的医疗事故。
Chest. 2019 Nov;156(5):907-914. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.102. Epub 2019 May 15.
9
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Medical Malpractice Closed Claim Study 1975-1978. A review of dermatologic claims.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1981 Dec;5(6):721-5. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(81)70132-4.
10
Delayed Diagnosis Is the Primary Cause of Sarcoma Litigation: Analysis of Malpractice Claims in the United States.延迟诊断是肉瘤诉讼的主要原因:美国医疗事故索赔分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2239-2253. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001340.

引用本文的文献

1
Litigation in Cubital Tunnel Surgery.尺神经沟手术中的诉讼
Hand (N Y). 2025 Sep 3:15589447251369033. doi: 10.1177/15589447251369033.
2
Do Noneconomic Damage Caps Reduce Medical Malpractice Insurance Premiums? Evidence from North Carolina.非经济损害赔偿限额会降低医疗事故保险费吗?来自北卡罗来纳州的证据。
Risk Manag Insur Rev. 2022 Summer;25(2):201-218. doi: 10.1111/rmir.12216. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
3
Recent U.S. Spine Surgery Malpractice Cases: A Legal Case Series Analysis From the LexisNexis Database.美国近期脊柱外科医疗事故案例:来自律商联讯数据库的法律案例系列分析

本文引用的文献

1
Medical malpractice: impact of the crisis and effect of state tort reforms.医疗事故:危机的影响与州侵权行为改革的效果
Synth Proj Res Synth Rep. 2006 May(10). Epub 2006 May 1.
2
Physicians' fears of malpractice lawsuits are not assuaged by tort reforms.医生对医疗事故诉讼的担忧并未因侵权改革而得到缓解。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1585-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0135.
3
National costs of the medical liability system.医疗责任制度的国家成本。
Global Spine J. 2025 Aug 21:21925682251371571. doi: 10.1177/21925682251371571.
4
A Model for Malpractice Preparedness for Plastic Surgery Residents.整形外科住院医师医疗事故防范模型
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jul 16;13(7):e6951. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006951. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
An innovative interprofessional mock trial experience: Collaboration between emergency medicine residency program and law school as a tool to demonstrate medical malpractice litigation.一种创新的跨专业模拟审判体验:急诊医学住院医师培训项目与法学院之间的合作作为展示医疗事故诉讼的工具。
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Jun 11;9(3):e70055. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70055. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Diagnostic Delay in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Review.软组织肉瘤的诊断延迟:综述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 31;17(11):1861. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111861.
7
Patient safety incidences: Perspectives of South African audiologists.患者安全事件:南非听力学家的观点
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2025 May 19;67(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/safp.v67i1.6134.
8
Subdural hematomas and medical malpractice in the USA: an analysis of 314 patients.美国的硬膜下血肿与医疗事故:314例患者的分析
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 May 30;10(2):e001462. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001462. eCollection 2025.
9
Journal Court: A Novel Approach to Incorporate Medicolegal Education into an Emergency Medicine Journal Club.期刊法庭:将法医学教育融入急诊医学期刊俱乐部的新方法。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 31;10(1):SG1-SG11. doi: 10.21980/J8093T. eCollection 2025 Jan.
10
Medicolegal aspects of digestive endoscopy: Results of a Chilean national survey.消化内镜检查的法医学方面:智利全国性调查结果
Endosc Int Open. 2025 May 12;13:a25706490. doi: 10.1055/a-2570-6490. eCollection 2025.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1569-77. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0807.
4
Urological malpractice: analysis of indemnity and claim data from 1985 to 2007.泌尿科医疗事故:1985 年至 2007 年的赔偿和索赔数据分析。
J Urol. 2010 Sep;184(3):1086-90; quiz 1235. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.034. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
5
The role of medical liability reform in federal health care reform.医疗责任改革在联邦医疗改革中的作用。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 2;361(1):1-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0903765. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
6
Malpractice liability costs and the practice of medicine in the Medicare program.医疗事故责任成本与医疗保险计划中的医疗实践。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):841-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.841.
7
Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.医疗事故诉讼中的索赔、失误及赔偿金支付
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 11;354(19):2024-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa054479.
8
Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment.在不稳定的医疗事故环境中,高风险专科医生的防御性医疗行为。
JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2609-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2609.
9
The growth of physician medical malpractice payments: evidence from the National Practitioner Data Bank.医生医疗事故赔偿的增长:来自国家从业者数据库的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-240-W5-249. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.240.
10
The medical malpractice 'crisis': recent trends and the impact of state tort reforms.医疗事故“危机”:近期趋势及州侵权行为改革的影响
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W4-20-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w4.20.