Newmarket Equine Hospital, Cambridge Road, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK.
Equine Vet J. 2012 May;44(3):339-45. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00443.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
Diagnostic navicular bursoscopy has been described in limited cases. Review of greater numbers is needed to define its contribution to case management and prognostic values.
To report: 1) clinical, diagnostic and endoscopic findings in a series of cases, 2) surgical techniques and case outcomes and 3) prognostic values. The authors hypothesise: 1) lameness localising to the navicular bursa is commonly associated with dorsal border deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT) lesions, 2) endoscopy allows extent of injuries to be assessed and treated, 3) case outcome relates to severity of DDFT injury and 4) the technique is safe and associated with little morbidity.
All horses that underwent endoscopy of a forelimb navicular bursa for investigation of lameness were identified. Case files were reviewed and those with injuries within the bursa selected for further analysis.
One-hundred-and-fourteen horses were identified. Ninety-two had injuries within the bursa and DDFT injuries were identified in 98% of bursae. Of those examined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 56% had combination injuries involving the DDFT and navicular bone. Sixty-one percent of horses returned to work sound, 42% returned to previous performance. Horses with extensive tearing and combination injuries of the DDFT and navicular bone identified with MRI, had worse outcomes.
Lameness localising to the navicular bursa is commonly associated with injuries to the dorsal border of the DDFT. Endoscopy permits identification and characterisation of injuries within the navicular bursa and enables lesion management. Outcome following debridement is related to severity of injury but overall is reasonable.
Horses with lameness localising to the navicular bursa may have tears of the DDFT. Bursoscopy is able to contribute diagnostic and prognostic information and debridement of lesions improves outcome compared to cases managed conservatively.
诊断性舟状骨滑囊镜检查已在少数病例中描述。需要更多的病例来定义其对病例管理和预后价值的贡献。
报告:1)一系列病例的临床、诊断和内镜检查结果,2)手术技术和病例结果,3)预后价值。作者假设:1)定位在舟状骨滑囊的跛行通常与背侧深趾屈肌腱(DDFT)的深部边界损伤有关,2)内镜检查可评估和治疗损伤的程度,3)病例结果与 DDFT 损伤的严重程度有关,4)该技术安全且并发症少。
确定了所有因跛行接受前肢舟状骨滑囊内镜检查的马匹。审查病例档案,并选择滑囊内有损伤的病例进行进一步分析。
共确定了 114 匹马。92 匹马的滑囊内有损伤,98%的滑囊中发现 DDFT 损伤。在接受磁共振成像(MRI)检查的病例中,56%的病例存在 DDFT 和舟骨的联合损伤。61%的马恢复工作正常,42%的马恢复到以前的表现。MRI 发现 DDFT 和舟骨广泛撕裂和联合损伤的马预后较差。
定位在舟状骨滑囊的跛行通常与 DDFT 的背侧边界损伤有关。内镜检查可识别和描述舟状骨滑囊内的损伤,并可进行病变处理。清创后的结果与损伤的严重程度有关,但总体上是合理的。
定位在舟状骨滑囊的跛行的马可能有 DDFT 的撕裂。滑囊镜检查能够提供诊断和预后信息,与保守治疗相比,清创病变可改善预后。