Department of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Clin Ther. 2011 Sep;33(9):1214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
Advisory committees for the regulatory agencies of the United States (US Food and Drug Administration [FDA]) and Canada (Health Canada) recently considered issues associated with the determination of bioequivalence for some multiphasic modified-release (MR) drug products. The FDA has concluded that because of the complicated properties of some multiphasic MR products, additional metrics such as partial AUC are required for their assessment, whereas an advisory panel of Health Canada has decided that the current metrics are adequate and sufficient.
The authors agree with the conclusion of the FDA that additional metrics are required.
The rationales considered by the advisory committees are discussed and commented upon. It is suggested that without applying an additional metric such as partial AUC, some multiphasic MR drug products might falsely be assumed to be therapeutically equivalent and unexpected clinical effects may occur.
美国(美国食品和药物管理局 [FDA])和加拿大(加拿大卫生部)的监管机构顾问委员会最近审议了与某些多相控释(MR)药物产品生物等效性确定相关的问题。FDA 得出的结论是,由于某些多相控释 MR 产品的复杂特性,需要额外的指标,如部分 AUC,来对其进行评估,而加拿大卫生部的一个顾问小组则决定,目前的指标是充分和足够的。
作者同意 FDA 的结论,即需要额外的指标。
讨论并评论了顾问委员会考虑的理由。有人建议,如果不采用部分 AUC 等额外指标,一些多相控释 MR 药物产品可能会被错误地认为具有治疗等效性,从而产生意想不到的临床效果。