Lee Lik Hang N, Choi Charles, Gershkovich Pavel, Barr Alasdair M, Honer William G, Procyshyn Ric M
Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2016 Dec;41(6):659-664. doi: 10.1007/s13318-016-0348-z.
The maximum plasma concentration (C ) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) are commonly used to establish bioequivalence between two formulations of the same oral medication. Similarly, these pharmacokinetic parameters have also been used to establish bioequivalence between two sites of administration for the same injectable formulation. However, these conventional methods of establishing bioequivalence are of limited use when comparing modified-release formulations of a drug, particularly those with rates of absorption that are amenable to change with the site of injection. Inherent differences in the rate of absorption can result in clinically significant differences in early exposure and drug response. Here, we propose the use of the partial AUC (pAUC) as a measure of early exposure to aid in the assessment of bioequivalence between the gluteal and the deltoid site of administration for long-acting injectable antipsychotics.
最大血浆浓度(Cmax)和血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)通常用于确定同一口服药物两种剂型之间的生物等效性。同样,这些药代动力学参数也已用于确定同一注射剂两种给药部位之间的生物等效性。然而,在比较药物的缓释制剂时,尤其是那些吸收速率会因注射部位而改变的制剂时,这些传统的生物等效性确定方法的用途有限。吸收速率的内在差异可能导致早期暴露和药物反应出现临床上的显著差异。在此,我们建议使用部分AUC(pAUC)作为早期暴露的衡量指标,以帮助评估长效注射用抗精神病药物在臀肌和三角肌给药部位之间的生物等效性。