University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. klaus.neuhaus @ zmk.unibe.ch
Caries Res. 2011;45(4):408-14. doi: 10.1159/000330530. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
The aim of this study was to evaluate, using visual assessment, an experimental optical sensor measuring perpendicular reflection intensity (PRI) as an indicator of enamel caries lesion activity/inactivity. Forty teeth with either an active or an inactive enamel lesion were selected from a pool of extracted teeth. Each tooth was cut into halves, with a clinically sound half and a half with a non-cavitated enamel lesion. After gentle plaque removal, the teeth were kept moistened. The lesions were then photographed and a defined measuring site per lesion was chosen and indicated with an arrow on a printout. Independently, the chosen site was visually assessed for lesion activity, and its glossiness was measured with PRI assessment. Surface roughness (SR) was assessed with optical profilometry using a confocal microscope. Visual assessment and PRI were repeated after several weeks and a reliability analysis was performed. For enamel lesions visually scored as active versus inactive, significantly different values were obtained with both PRI and SR. PRI values of the clinically sound control surfaces were significantly different only from active lesions. Generally, inactive lesions had the same glossiness and the same roughness as the sound control surfaces. The reliabilities for visual assessment (κ = 0.89) and for PRI (ICC = 0.86) were high. It is concluded that, within the limits of this study, PRI can be regarded as a promising tool for quantitative enamel lesion activity assessment. There is scope and potential for the PRI device to be considerably improved for in vivo use.
本研究旨在通过视觉评估,评估一种用于测量垂直反射强度(PRI)的实验性光学传感器,作为评估牙釉质龋损活性/非活性的指标。从一组拔出的牙齿中选择了 40 颗具有活性或非活性牙釉质龋损的牙齿。每颗牙齿都被切成两半,一半是临床健康的,另一半是无龋坏的牙釉质。在轻轻去除牙菌斑后,牙齿保持湿润。然后对病变部位进行拍照,并选择每个病变的指定测量部位,并在打印件上用箭头指示。独立地,通过视觉评估病变的活动性,并使用 PRI 评估测量其光泽度。使用共焦显微镜的光学轮廓仪评估表面粗糙度(SR)。视觉评估和 PRI 分别在几周后重复进行,并进行了可靠性分析。对于视觉评估为活性与非活性的牙釉质病变,PRI 和 SR 均获得了显著不同的结果。临床健康对照表面的 PRI 值仅与活性病变有显著差异。通常,非活性病变与健康对照表面具有相同的光泽度和粗糙度。视觉评估的可靠性(κ=0.89)和 PRI(ICC=0.86)均较高。研究结论认为,在本研究范围内,PRI 可被视为定量评估牙釉质病变活性的有前途的工具。PRI 设备在用于体内的情况下具有很大的改进空间和潜力。