Opherk D, Schuler G, Waas W, Dietz R, Kübler W
Medical Clinic III (Cardiology), University of Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany.
Eur Heart J. 1990 Apr;11(4):342-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059708.
Systemic and coronary haemodynamic effects of carbochromen (0.125 mg kg-1 min-1 for 40 min i.v.) and dipyridamole (0.05 mg kg-1 min-1 for 10 min i.v.) were investigated in 18 patients without detectable heart disease. Both drugs induced a comparable increase in coronary blood flow (carbochromen: from 82 +/- 23 to 337 +/- 68 ml.100 g-1.min-1; dipyridamole: from 78 +/- 9 to 301 +/- 61 ml.100 g-1.min-1). This resulted in a minimal coronary resistance of 0.23 +/- 0.04 mmHg.ml-1.100 g.min for dipyridamole and of 0.24 +/- 0.04 mmHg.ml-1.100 g.min for carbochromen. In response to dipyridamole (n = 12) heart rate increased from 73 to 94 beats min-1 (P less than 0.005) and mean aortic pressure fell from 89 to 78 mmHg (P less than 0.001). After administration of carbochromen (n = 6) no significant systemic effects occurred. Dipyridamole induced a significant increase in myocardial oxygen consumption by 46% (P less than 0.001); after application of carbochromen myocardial oxygen consumption remained unchanged. From these data it can be concluded that for the evaluation of coronary dilatory capacity carbochromen may be more suitable than dipyridamole because (1) maximal coronary vasodilation is induced without changes in myocardial oxygen consumption and (2) no systemic effects occur.