Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023143. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
Previous studies of risk factors for disability pension (DP) have mainly focused on psychosocial, or environmental, factors, while the relative importance of genetic effects has been less studied. Sex differences in biological mechanisms have not been investigated at all.
The study sample included 46,454 Swedish twins, consisting of 23,227 complete twin pairs, born 1928-1958, who were followed during 1993-2008. Data on DP, including diagnoses, were obtained from the National Social Insurance Agency. Within-pair similarity in liability to DP was assessed by calculating intraclass correlations. Genetic and environmental influences on liability to DP were estimated by applying discrete-time frailty modeling.
During follow-up, 7,669 individuals were granted DP (18.8% women and 14.1% men). Intraclass correlations were generally higher in MZ pairs than DZ pairs, while DZ same-sexed pairs were more similar than opposite-sexed pairs. The best-fitting model indicated that genetic factors contributed 49% (95% CI: 39-59) to the variance in DP due to mental diagnoses, 35% (95% CI: 29-41) due to musculoskeletal diagnoses, and 27% (95% CI: 20-33) due to all other diagnoses. In both sexes, genetic effects common to all ages explained one-third, whereas age-specific factors almost two-thirds, of the total variance in liability to DP irrespective of diagnosis. Sex differences in liability to DP were indicated, in that partly different sets of genes were found to operate in women and men, even though the magnitude of genetic variance explained was equal for both sexes.
The findings of the study suggest that genetic effects are important for liability to DP due to different diagnoses. Moreover, genetic contributions to liability to DP tend to differ between women and men, even though the overall relative contribution of genetic influences does not differ by sex. Hence, the pathways leading to DP might differ between women and men.
先前关于残疾养老金(DP)风险因素的研究主要集中在心理社会或环境因素上,而遗传效应的相对重要性则研究较少。性别差异在生物学机制方面根本没有被研究过。
研究样本包括 46454 名瑞典双胞胎,其中包括 23227 对完整的双胞胎,出生于 1928 年至 1958 年,在 1993 年至 2008 年期间进行了随访。DP 数据(包括诊断)是从国家社会保险局获得的。通过计算内对相似性,评估了 DP 易感性的个体内相似性。通过应用离散时间脆弱性建模来估计 DP 易感性的遗传和环境影响。
在随访期间,有 7669 人获得 DP(女性为 18.8%,男性为 14.1%)。MZ 对之间的内对相似性通常高于 DZ 对,而 DZ 同性别对之间的相似性高于异性别对。最佳拟合模型表明,遗传因素对精神诊断的 DP 变异的贡献为 49%(95%CI:39-59),对肌肉骨骼诊断的 DP 变异的贡献为 35%(95%CI:29-41),对所有其他诊断的 DP 变异的贡献为 27%(95%CI:20-33)。在两性中,遗传效应普遍适用于所有年龄段,解释了 DP 易感性总变异的三分之一,而年龄特异性因素则解释了 DP 易感性总变异的三分之二,无论诊断如何。DP 易感性存在性别差异,表明在女性和男性中发现了部分不同的基因集在起作用,尽管解释的遗传方差大小相等。
研究结果表明,遗传效应对于不同诊断的 DP 易感性很重要。此外,DP 易感性的遗传贡献在女性和男性之间存在差异,尽管遗传影响的整体相对贡献没有性别差异。因此,导致 DP 的途径可能在女性和男性之间存在差异。