Suppr超能文献

心房颤动患者 INR 的变异性及其与死亡率、卒中、出血和住院的关系。

Variability of INR and its relationship with mortality, stroke, bleeding and hospitalisations in patients with atrial fibrillation.

机构信息

Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2012 Jan;129(1):32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

BACKGROUND - RATIONALE FOR STUDY: Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke and mortality which is reduced by treatment with warfarin. The most commonly used tool to assess the effectiveness of warfarin therapy is the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of International Normalised Ratio (INR) 2.0-3.0. Our aim was to study whether INR variability, as assessed by the standard deviation of transformed INR (SDT(INR)) is more prognostically important than the TTR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 19,180 patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin therapy to evaluate the association of TTR and that of SDT(INR) with all-cause mortality, stroke, bleeding and hospitalisation. The SDT(INR) was more prognostically important than the TTR. One standard deviation (SD) higher of SDT(INR) had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.59 (95% CI 1.52-1.66) of mortality compared with 1.18 (95% CI 1.13-1.24) for one SD lower of TTR. For the other 3 events the HR was also higher for the SDT(INR) than for the TTR (stroke 1.30 (95% CI 1.22-1.39) vs. 1.06 (95% CI 1.00-1.13), bleeding 1.27 (95% CI 1.20-1.35) vs. 1.07 (95% CI 1.01-1.14) , hospitalisation 1.47 (95% CI 1.45-1.49) vs. 1.13 (95% CI 1.10-1.15). When both metrics were included in the same analysis only the SDT(INR) was of significant predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

The SDT(INR) is a better predictor of mortality, stroke, bleeding and hospitalisation than the TTR in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving warfarin therapy.

摘要

目的

研究背景-研究理由:房颤与卒中风险和死亡率增加相关,而华法林治疗可降低这些风险。评估华法林治疗效果最常用的工具是国际标准化比值(INR)2.0-3.0 的治疗范围内时间(TTR)。我们的目的是研究 INR 变异性(通过 INR 转化的标准差评估,SDT(INR))是否比 TTR 更具有预后意义。

方法和结果

我们研究了 19180 例接受华法林治疗的房颤患者,以评估 TTR 和 SDT(INR)与全因死亡率、卒中、出血和住院之间的关系。SDT(INR)比 TTR 更具有预后意义。SDT(INR)每增加一个标准差(SD),死亡率的风险比(HR)为 1.59(95%CI 1.52-1.66),而 TTR 每降低一个 SD,死亡率的 HR 为 1.18(95%CI 1.13-1.24)。对于其他 3 个事件,SDT(INR)的 HR 也高于 TTR(卒中 1.30(95%CI 1.22-1.39)vs. 1.06(95%CI 1.00-1.13),出血 1.27(95%CI 1.20-1.35)vs. 1.07(95%CI 1.01-1.14),住院 1.47(95%CI 1.45-1.49)vs. 1.13(95%CI 1.10-1.15)。当这两个指标同时纳入同一分析时,只有 SDT(INR)具有显著的预测价值。

结论

在接受华法林治疗的房颤患者中,SDT(INR)是死亡率、卒中、出血和住院的更好预测指标,优于 TTR。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验