Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 3422 Keswick Rd, Baltimore, MD 21211, United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(7):1097-104. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.040. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
Recruiting a representative sample using respondent driven sampling (RDS) relies on successful peer recruitment. While prior studies have identified individual-level characteristics associated with peer recruitment, study- and neighborhood-level factors may also influence peer recruitment. This analysis aimed to identify individual-, study-, and neighborhood-level factors associated with RDS peer recruitment. 390 young adult (18-40 years) heroin, crack and/or cocaine users in New York City (NYC) were recruited via RDS into a cohort study aiming to identify social risk factors for transitioning from non-injection to injection drug use (2006-2009). Individual-level baseline characteristics (demographics, drug use, and network characteristics) and study factors (number of recruitment coupons received and participant attendance at RDS training sessions (RDST) on peer recruitment) were ascertained. Aggregate measures of neighborhood attitudes about drug use, drug users, and HIV were obtained from a separate anonymous NYC resident random-digit-dialing survey (2002) and linked with baseline data by zip code. Descriptive statistics and multilevel modeling were used to identify factors associated with peer recruitment. After adjustment, recruiting each additional eligible peer recruit was associated with receiving additional recruitment coupons, RDST attendance, and a greater proportion of community residents in one's recruitment neighborhood believing that clean needles should be made available to IDUs; heroin use was negatively associated with recruiting additional eligible peers. After adjustment, recruiting each additional peer (regardless of eligibility) was associated with receiving additional recruitment coupons and RDST attendance. Our data highlight the importance of neighborhood factors and suggest that RDS may not be as effective in areas characterized by negative attitudes about drug use. Group-facilitated recruitment training sessions may help counter negative social norms when implementing RDS in drug user studies.
采用响应者驱动抽样(RDS)招募有代表性的样本依赖于成功的同伴招募。虽然先前的研究已经确定了与同伴招募相关的个体特征,但研究和社区层面的因素也可能影响同伴招募。本分析旨在确定与 RDS 同伴招募相关的个体、研究和社区层面的因素。390 名纽约市(NYC)的年轻成年(18-40 岁)海洛因、冰毒和/或可卡因使用者通过 RDS 被招募到一项队列研究中,旨在确定从非注射向注射药物使用过渡的社会风险因素(2006-2009 年)。确定了个体层面的基线特征(人口统计学、药物使用和网络特征)和研究因素(收到的招募优惠券数量以及参与者参加 RDS 同伴招募培训课程(RDST)的次数)。通过单独的匿名纽约市居民随机拨号调查(2002 年)获得了关于社区对药物使用、药物使用者和 HIV 的态度的综合指标,并通过邮政编码与基线数据相联系。采用描述性统计和多层次模型来确定与同伴招募相关的因素。调整后,招募每一个额外符合条件的同伴招募者与收到额外的招募优惠券、RDST 出席以及招募者所在社区居民中更多人认为应该为 IDU 提供清洁的针头有关;与招募更多符合条件的同伴相比,使用海洛因与招募更多符合条件的同伴负相关。调整后,招募每一个额外的同伴(无论是否符合条件)都与收到额外的招募优惠券和 RDST 出席有关。我们的数据强调了社区因素的重要性,并表明 RDS 在以对药物使用的负面态度为特征的地区可能效果不佳。在药物使用者研究中实施 RDS 时,小组促进的招募培训课程可能有助于对抗负面的社会规范。