Diez Roux A-V
Department of Epidemiology, Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007 Feb;55(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2006.12.003.
In recent years there has been an explosion of interest in neighborhood health effects. Most existing work has relied on secondary data analyses and has used administrative areas and aggregate census data to characterize neighborhoods. Important questions remain regarding whether the associations reported by these studies reflect causal processes. This paper reviews the major limitations of existing work and discusses areas for future development including: (1) definition and measurement of area or ecologic attributes; (2) consideration of spatial scale; (3) cumulative exposures and lagged effects; (4) the complementary nature of observational, quasi-experimental, and experimental evidence. As is usually the case with complex research questions, consensus regarding the presence and magnitude of neighborhood health effects will emerge from the work of multiple disciplines, often with diverse methodological approaches, each with its strengths and its limitations. Partnership across disciplines, as well as among health researchers, communities, urban planners, and policy experts will be key.
近年来,人们对社区健康影响的兴趣激增。大多数现有研究依赖于二手数据分析,并使用行政区和人口普查汇总数据来描述社区特征。这些研究报告的关联是否反映因果过程,仍存在重要问题。本文回顾了现有研究的主要局限性,并讨论了未来的发展方向,包括:(1)区域或生态属性的定义和测量;(2)空间尺度的考量;(3)累积暴露和滞后效应;(4)观察性、准实验性和实验性证据的互补性。与复杂研究问题通常的情况一样,关于社区健康影响的存在和程度的共识将来自多学科的研究工作,这些研究往往采用不同的方法,每种方法都有其优势和局限性。跨学科合作,以及健康研究人员、社区、城市规划师和政策专家之间的合作将是关键。