Ambulante Pneumologie, Stuttgart, Germany.
Eur Respir J. 2012 Mar;39(3):669-76. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00051711. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
Patient prognosis in lung cancer largely depends on early diagnosis. The exhaled breath of patients may represent the ideal specimen for future lung cancer screening. However, the clinical applicability of current diagnostic sensor technologies based on signal pattern analysis remains incalculable due to their inability to identify a clear target. To test the robustness of the presence of a so far unknown volatile organic compound in the breath of patients with lung cancer, sniffer dogs were applied. Exhalation samples of 220 volunteers (healthy individuals, confirmed lung cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)) were presented to sniffer dogs following a rigid scientific protocol. Patient history, drug administration and clinicopathological data were analysed to identify potential bias or confounders. Lung cancer was identified with an overall sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 93%. Lung cancer detection was independent from COPD and the presence of tobacco smoke and food odours. Logistic regression identified two drugs as potential confounders. It must be assumed that a robust and specific volatile organic compound (or pattern) is present in the breath of patients with lung cancer. Additional research efforts are required to overcome the current technical limitations of electronic sensor technologies to engineer a clinically applicable screening tool.
肺癌患者的预后在很大程度上取决于早期诊断。患者呼出的气体可能代表未来肺癌筛查的理想样本。然而,由于目前基于信号模式分析的诊断传感器技术无法识别明确的目标,其临床适用性仍难以估量。为了测试目前未知挥发性有机化合物在肺癌患者呼吸中存在的稳健性,研究人员应用了嗅探犬。按照严格的科学方案,将 220 名志愿者(健康个体、确诊肺癌或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者)的呼气样本呈现给嗅探犬。分析患者病史、药物使用和临床病理数据,以确定潜在的偏差或混杂因素。嗅探犬检测肺癌的总体敏感性为 71%,特异性为 93%。肺癌的检测独立于 COPD 以及烟草烟雾和食物气味的存在。逻辑回归确定了两种药物作为潜在的混杂因素。可以假设在肺癌患者的呼吸中存在一种稳健且特异性的挥发性有机化合物(或模式)。需要进一步研究以克服电子传感器技术目前的技术限制,以设计出一种临床适用的筛查工具。