School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland BT52 1SA, UK.
Northern Ireland Public Health Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland BT9 7AD, UK.
J Med Microbiol. 2011 Dec;60(Pt 12):1782-1786. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.027573-0. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of disc diffusion testing with penicillin, erythromycin and ciprofloxacin within the viridans group streptococci (VGS). In total, the antibiotic susceptibilities of 167 VGS isolates were compared by standard disc diffusion and broth microdilution methods, and these phenotypic data were compared to the carriage of the respective gene resistance determinants [ermB and mefA/E (macrolides); QRDR, gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE (quinolones)]. Overall, there were 35 discrepancies [resistant by MIC and susceptible by zone diameter (21.0%)] between MIC and disc diameter when penicillin susceptibility was interpreted by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria. Scattergrams showed a bimodal distribution between non-susceptible and susceptible strains when erythromycin susceptibility was tested by both methods. Thirty-four (20.4%) isolates were categorized as resistant by MIC breakpoints, while disc diameter defined these as having intermediate resistance. With ciprofloxacin, three isolates (1.8%) showed minor discrepancies between MIC breakpoints and disc diameter. Isolates non-susceptible to all three antimicrobial agents tested were reliably distinguished from susceptible isolates by disc diffusion testing, except for the detection of low-level resistance to penicillin, where broth microdilution or an alternative quantitative MIC method should be used. Otherwise, we conclude that disc diffusion testing is a reliable method to detect strains of VGS non-susceptible to penicillin, erythromycin and ciprofloxacin, as demonstrated with their concordance to their gene resistance characteristics.
本研究旨在调查青霉素、红霉素和环丙沙星在草绿色链球菌(VGS)中的碟片扩散试验的可靠性。总共比较了 167 株 VGS 分离株的抗生素敏感性,采用标准碟片扩散和肉汤微量稀释法,并将这些表型数据与各自的基因耐药决定因素[ermB 和 mefA/E(大环内酯类);QRDR、gyrA、gyrB、parC 和 parE(喹诺酮类)]进行比较。总体而言,当按照临床和实验室标准协会标准解释青霉素敏感性时,MIC 与碟片直径之间存在 35 处差异[MIC 耐药而直径敏感(21.0%)]。当用两种方法检测红霉素敏感性时,散点图显示非耐药和敏感菌株之间呈双峰分布。34 株(20.4%)分离株根据 MIC 折点被归类为耐药,而碟片直径则将其定义为中介耐药。用环丙沙星时,有 3 株(1.8%)分离株 MIC 折点与碟片直径之间存在较小差异。除了检测青霉素的低水平耐药外,所有三种被测试抗菌药物均不敏感的分离株可通过碟片扩散试验可靠地区别于敏感分离株,在这种情况下,应使用肉汤微量稀释法或替代定量 MIC 方法。否则,我们得出结论,碟片扩散试验是一种可靠的方法,可用于检测对青霉素、红霉素和环丙沙星均不敏感的 VGS 菌株,这与其基因耐药特征的一致性相一致。