Canter Daniel, Kutikov Alexander, Golovine Konstantin, Makhov Petr, Simhan Jay, Uzzo Robert G, Kolenko Vladimir M
Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA.
Can J Urol. 2011 Aug;18(4):5819-25.
We examined the in vitro cellular effects of the multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib and pazopanib on a series of human renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines.
The human RCC cell lines 769-P, 786-O, HRC-24, HRC-31, HRC-45, HRC-78, SK-26B, and SK-45 were treated with varying concentrations of sunitinib and pazopanib. Cellular proliferation and cellular death were assessed using the CellTiter-Blue Cell Viability Assay and the TUNEL assay, respectively. Effective doses (ED) for inhibition of cellular proliferation or induction of apoptosis were calculated for sunitinib and pazopanib in each RCC cell line.
Both sunitinib and pazopanib exhibited anti-proliferative activity to varying degree against all human RCC cell lines; however, sunitinib's effects were achieved at significantly lower concentrations. Moreover, sunitinib had a direct pro-apoptotic effect on all tested cell lines, while pazopanib failed to induce apoptosis in any of the examined human RCC cell lines even at maximal concentrations.
Although sunitinib and pazopanib are often used interchangeably in the clinical setting, our results suggest that in-vitro biological activity of the two agents differs. Sunitinib exhibits a cytotoxic effect on RCC cell lines, while pazopanib's activity is solely cytostatic. These data may be clinically relevant given the current lack of comparative in-vivo studies between the two agents.
我们研究了多靶点受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)舒尼替尼和帕唑帕尼对一系列人肾细胞癌(RCC)细胞系的体外细胞效应。
用不同浓度的舒尼替尼和帕唑帕尼处理人RCC细胞系769-P、786-O、HRC-24、HRC-31、HRC-45、HRC-78、SK-26B和SK-45。分别使用CellTiter-Blue细胞活力测定法和TUNEL测定法评估细胞增殖和细胞死亡情况。计算舒尼替尼和帕唑帕尼在每个RCC细胞系中抑制细胞增殖或诱导凋亡的有效剂量(ED)。
舒尼替尼和帕唑帕尼对所有人类RCC细胞系均表现出不同程度的抗增殖活性;然而,舒尼替尼在显著更低的浓度下就能达到其效果。此外,舒尼替尼对所有测试细胞系均有直接促凋亡作用,而帕唑帕尼即使在最大浓度下也未能在任何检测的人RCC细胞系中诱导凋亡。
尽管舒尼替尼和帕唑帕尼在临床环境中常可互换使用,但我们的结果表明这两种药物的体外生物学活性不同。舒尼替尼对RCC细胞系表现出细胞毒性作用,而帕唑帕尼的活性仅为细胞生长抑制作用。鉴于目前这两种药物之间缺乏比较性体内研究,这些数据可能具有临床相关性。