• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全局和局部注意对类别和坐标空间关系处理的影响。

Effects of the global and local attention on the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 2011 Nov;77(2):292-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.008.

DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.008
PMID:21856063
Abstract

Participants made categorical or coordinate spatial judgments on the global or local elements of shapes. Stimuli were composed of a horizontal line and two dots. In the Categorical task, participants judged whether the line was above or below the dots. In the Coordinate task, they judged whether the line would fit between the dots. Stimuli were made hierarchical so that the global patterns composed of a "global line" made of local dots-and-line units, and "global dot" made of a single dots-and-line unit. The results indicated that the categorical task was better performed when participants attended to the local level of the hierarchical stimuli. On the other hand, the coordinate task was better performed when they attended to the global level. These findings are consistent with computer simulation models of the attentional modulation of neuronal receptive fields' size suggesting that (1) coordinate spatial relations are more efficiently encoded when one attends to a relatively large region of space, whereas (2) categorical spatial relations are more efficiently encoded when one attends to a relatively small region of space.

摘要

参与者对形状的全局或局部元素进行了类别或坐标空间判断。刺激由一条水平线和两个点组成。在类别任务中,参与者判断线是否在点的上方或下方。在坐标任务中,他们判断线是否会在点之间拟合。刺激是分层的,使得由“全局线”组成的全局模式由局部点线单元组成,以及由单个点线单元组成的“全局点”。结果表明,当参与者关注分层刺激的局部水平时,类别任务表现更好。另一方面,当他们关注全局水平时,坐标任务表现更好。这些发现与注意调节神经元感受野大小的计算机模拟模型一致,表明 (1) 当人们关注相对较大的空间区域时,坐标空间关系的编码效率更高,而 (2) 当人们关注相对较小的空间区域时,类别空间关系的编码效率更高。

相似文献

1
Effects of the global and local attention on the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.全局和局部注意对类别和坐标空间关系处理的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2011 Nov;77(2):292-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.008.
2
Varying the scope of attention alters the encoding of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.注意范围的变化改变了类别和坐标空间关系的编码。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2769-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.027. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
3
Processing spatial relations with different apertures of attention.处理具有不同注意孔径的空间关系。
Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;35(2):297-329. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01139.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
4
Exogenous attention differentially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.外源性注意对分类空间关系和坐标空间关系的加工进行差异性调节。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Sep;135(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 4.
5
Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in the absence of low spatial frequencies.在缺乏低空间频率的情况下,大脑半球对分类和坐标空间关系的处理。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Feb 15;14(2):291-7. doi: 10.1162/089892902317236902.
6
Coding categorical and coordinate spatial relations in visual-spatial short-term memory.在视觉空间短期记忆中对分类和坐标空间关系进行编码。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Dec;62(12):2372-87. doi: 10.1080/17470210902853548. Epub 2009 May 11.
7
The effect of stimulus features on working memory of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in patients with unilateral brain damage.刺激特征对单侧脑损伤患者类别和坐标空间关系工作记忆的影响。
Cortex. 2012 Jun;48(6):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
8
Divergence of categorical and coordinate spatial processing assessed with ERPs.通过事件相关电位评估的分类与坐标空间处理的差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(9):1547-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.019. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
9
The relationship between allocentric and egocentric frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial information processing.以自我为中心和以客体为中心的参照系与分类和坐标空间信息处理之间的关系。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jun;64(6):1138-56. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.539700. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
10
The effect of attentional scope on spatial relation processing: a case study.注意广度对空间关系加工的影响:一项个案研究。
Neurocase. 2013;19(5):505-12. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2012.701640. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial Frequency Tuning of Body Inversion Effects.身体倒置效应的空间频率调谐
Brain Sci. 2023 Jan 23;13(2):190. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020190.
2
Lateralized pointing does not cause a cognitive bias.偏侧指向不会导致认知偏差。
Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0833-6. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
3
Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies.物体识别中的分类和坐标处理依赖于不同的空间频率。
Cogn Process. 2015 Feb;16(1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s10339-014-0635-z. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
4
Focusing narrowly or broadly attention when judging categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a MEG study.当判断类别和坐标空间关系时,注意力狭窄或广泛集中:一项 MEG 研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e83434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083434. eCollection 2013.