Suppr超能文献

认知状态对 MS 患者记忆主诉的影响。

Impact of the cognitive status on the memory complaints in MS patients.

机构信息

Département de psychologie and Institut des sciences cognitives, Université du Québec à Montréal, CP 8888, Succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Neurol Sci. 2011 Sep;38(5):728-33. doi: 10.1017/s031716710005410x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite the evidence of cognitive deficits in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients, evaluation of their cognitive integrity is often limited to the use of clinical interviews and questionnaires. However, the consensus in the literature is that these patients under- or overestimate their deficits and repercussions. The objective of this study was to clarify why some patients overestimate while others underestimate their memory deficits.

METHOD

Fifty-four participants (30 MS, 24 controls) completed the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) and were tested on a battery of neuropsychological tests. Based on the test results, MS patients were categorized as having either mild or moderate/severe cognitive deficits.

RESULTS

The moderate/severe MS group differed from the two other groups on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) but did not differ from the control group on the PRMQ. Conversely, the mild MS group did not differ from the control group on the RAVLT but did report significantly more problems than this group on the PRMQ. There was no difference between the two clinical groups on the Depression Index (Beck) but there was a significant correlation (r=.409) between the depression scores and the overestimation of prospective memory problems (PRMQ).

CONCLUSION

The results explain the contradiction in the literature. It is the mild group who overestimates, maybe because they are overly concerned by their deficits, whereas the cognitive impairments of the moderate/severe group lead them to underestimate and may make their self-assessment unreliable. Formal testing or information from a significant other would be advisable.

摘要

目的

尽管多发性硬化症(MS)患者存在认知缺陷的证据,但对其认知完整性的评估通常仅限于使用临床访谈和问卷。然而,文献中的共识是,这些患者低估或高估了他们的缺陷和影响。本研究的目的是阐明为什么一些患者高估而另一些患者低估他们的记忆缺陷。

方法

54 名参与者(30 名 MS,24 名对照)完成了前瞻性和回顾性记忆问卷(PRMQ),并接受了一系列神经心理学测试。根据测试结果,MS 患者被分为轻度或中度/重度认知缺陷。

结果

中度/重度 MS 组在 Rey 听觉言语学习测试(RAVLT)上与其他两组不同,但在 PRMQ 上与对照组没有差异。相反,轻度 MS 组在 RAVLT 上与对照组没有差异,但在 PRMQ 上报告的问题明显多于对照组。两组临床组在 Beck 抑郁指数上没有差异,但抑郁评分与前瞻性记忆问题高估之间存在显著相关性(r=.409)。

结论

结果解释了文献中的矛盾。高估的是轻度组,也许是因为他们过度关注自己的缺陷,而中度/重度组的认知障碍使他们低估了自己的情况,这可能使他们的自我评估不可靠。建议进行正式测试或从重要他人那里获取信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验