Département de psychologie and Institut des sciences cognitives, Université du Québec à Montréal, CP 8888, Succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2011 Sep;38(5):728-33. doi: 10.1017/s031716710005410x.
Despite the evidence of cognitive deficits in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients, evaluation of their cognitive integrity is often limited to the use of clinical interviews and questionnaires. However, the consensus in the literature is that these patients under- or overestimate their deficits and repercussions. The objective of this study was to clarify why some patients overestimate while others underestimate their memory deficits.
Fifty-four participants (30 MS, 24 controls) completed the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) and were tested on a battery of neuropsychological tests. Based on the test results, MS patients were categorized as having either mild or moderate/severe cognitive deficits.
The moderate/severe MS group differed from the two other groups on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) but did not differ from the control group on the PRMQ. Conversely, the mild MS group did not differ from the control group on the RAVLT but did report significantly more problems than this group on the PRMQ. There was no difference between the two clinical groups on the Depression Index (Beck) but there was a significant correlation (r=.409) between the depression scores and the overestimation of prospective memory problems (PRMQ).
The results explain the contradiction in the literature. It is the mild group who overestimates, maybe because they are overly concerned by their deficits, whereas the cognitive impairments of the moderate/severe group lead them to underestimate and may make their self-assessment unreliable. Formal testing or information from a significant other would be advisable.
尽管多发性硬化症(MS)患者存在认知缺陷的证据,但对其认知完整性的评估通常仅限于使用临床访谈和问卷。然而,文献中的共识是,这些患者低估或高估了他们的缺陷和影响。本研究的目的是阐明为什么一些患者高估而另一些患者低估他们的记忆缺陷。
54 名参与者(30 名 MS,24 名对照)完成了前瞻性和回顾性记忆问卷(PRMQ),并接受了一系列神经心理学测试。根据测试结果,MS 患者被分为轻度或中度/重度认知缺陷。
中度/重度 MS 组在 Rey 听觉言语学习测试(RAVLT)上与其他两组不同,但在 PRMQ 上与对照组没有差异。相反,轻度 MS 组在 RAVLT 上与对照组没有差异,但在 PRMQ 上报告的问题明显多于对照组。两组临床组在 Beck 抑郁指数上没有差异,但抑郁评分与前瞻性记忆问题高估之间存在显著相关性(r=.409)。
结果解释了文献中的矛盾。高估的是轻度组,也许是因为他们过度关注自己的缺陷,而中度/重度组的认知障碍使他们低估了自己的情况,这可能使他们的自我评估不可靠。建议进行正式测试或从重要他人那里获取信息。