School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff , UK.
Ann Bot. 2011 Oct;108(5):945-64. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr202. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
Molecular evidence indicates that the Neotropical sub-tribe Zygopetalinae is sister to Maxillariinae. Most members of the latter sub-tribe have deceit pollination strategies, but some species produce rewards such as nectar, pseudopollen, resin and wax, and are pollinated by a range of pollinators that include stingless bees (Meliponini), wasps and hummingbirds. By contrast, relatively little is known about the pollination of Zygopetalinae species. However, some are pollinated by fragrance-gathering, male euglossine bees or employ nectar deceit strategies. The aim of this study is to describe the labellar micromorphology of Zygopetalinae and to compare it with that of Maxillariinae sensu lato (s.l.) as part of an ongoing project to record the range of labellar characters found within the tribe Maxillarieae, and to assess whether these characters represent synapomorphies or homoplasies resulting from similar pollination pressures.
The labella of 31 species of Zygopetalinae, including Cryptarrhena R. Br. and representatives of the Zygopetalum, Huntleya and Warrea clades, were examined using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, and the range of labellar characters was recorded. These characters were subsequently compared with those of Maxillariinae s.l. which formed the subject of our previous investigations.
The labellar micromorphology of Zygopetalinae is less diverse than that of Maxillariinae and does not reflect the currently accepted phylogeny of the former sub-tribe based on molecular studies. Instead, the relative uniformity in labellar micromorphology of Zygopetalinae is probably due to homoplasies resulting from similar pollinator pressures. Labellar trichomes are relatively uncommon in Zygopetalinae, but occur in certain members of both the Zygopetalum and Huntleya clades. Trichomes are unbranched, uniseriate and multicellular with rounded apices, or unbranched and unicellular, with tapering, pointed and flexuose apices. Hitherto, unicellular trichomes of this kind have been observed only for euglossophilous orchid taxa, and the adoption of a relatively limited range of pollination strategies by Zygopetalinae may have resulted in reduced investment in micromorphological labellar characters.
分子证据表明,新热带亚族 Zygopetalinae 与 Maxillariinae 是姐妹群。后者的大多数成员具有欺骗性授粉策略,但有些物种会产生花蜜、拟花粉、树脂和蜡等奖励,并且由一系列传粉者授粉,包括无刺蜜蜂(Meliponini)、黄蜂和蜂鸟。相比之下,关于 Zygopetalinae 物种的授粉情况知之甚少。然而,一些物种由散发香味的雄性 Euglossine 蜜蜂授粉,或者采用花蜜欺骗策略。本研究的目的是描述 Zygopetalinae 的唇瓣微形态,并将其与广义的 Maxillariinae 进行比较,这是正在进行的记录 Maxillarieae 族内唇瓣特征范围的项目的一部分,并评估这些特征是否代表由于相似授粉压力而产生的同源特征或同形特征。
使用光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜检查了 31 种 Zygopetalinae 物种的唇瓣,包括 Cryptarrhena R. Br. 和 Zygopetalum、Huntleya 和 Warrea 进化枝的代表,并记录了唇瓣特征的范围。随后将这些特征与我们之前研究的广义的 Maxillariinae 进行比较。
Zygopetalinae 的唇瓣微形态不如 Maxillariinae 多样化,也不能反映基于分子研究的该亚族目前公认的系统发育。相反,Zygopetalinae 唇瓣微形态的相对均匀性可能是由于相似授粉压力导致的同源特征。唇瓣毛状体在 Zygopetalinae 中相对较少见,但在 Zygopetalum 和 Huntleya 进化枝的某些成员中存在。毛状体无分枝、单列式和多细胞,顶端圆形,或无分枝、单细胞,顶端渐细、尖细和弯曲。迄今为止,这种单细胞毛状体仅在 Euglossophilous 兰花类群中观察到,而 Zygopetalinae 采用相对有限的授粉策略范围可能导致在微形态唇瓣特征上的投资减少。