Kerr Natalie C, Somes Grant, Enzenauer Robert W
Hamilton Eye Institute and Preventive Medicine Department, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38103, USA.
Am Orthopt J. 2011;61:117-23. doi: 10.3368/aoj.61.1.117.
We evaluated the impact of developmentally-at-risk status on the results of photorefractive screening with iScreen®.
We sequentially recruited 169 children (aged 2-5 years) to participate in a blinded, prospective study of a photoscreening device. The principle investigator examined the children after photoscreening. Using established standards for amblyogenic factors, the principle investigator and photoscreen interpreters separately made a determination of "normal" or "needs referral" for each child. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the photoscreening device were determined.
Overall, sensitivity was 85% with a positive predictive value of 98%, and specificity was 87% with a negative predictive value of 47%. Developmentally-at-risk status in 34 children (three refused imaging) did not reduce sensitivity (89%) or specificity (100%) when compared with 130 children (two refused imaging) who did not have developmentally-at-risk factors (sensitivity = 84% and specificity = 80%).
The efficacy of photorefractive screening in young children with developmentally-at-risk status is comparable to results found in normal children.
我们评估了发育风险状态对使用iScreen®进行屈光筛查结果的影响。
我们连续招募了169名2至5岁的儿童,参与一项关于光筛查设备的盲法前瞻性研究。主要研究者在光筛查后对儿童进行检查。主要研究者和光筛查解读人员根据既定的致弱视因素标准,分别对每个儿童做出“正常”或“需要转诊”的判定。确定了光筛查设备的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。
总体而言,敏感性为85%,阳性预测值为98%,特异性为87%,阴性预测值为47%。与130名无发育风险因素的儿童(2名拒绝成像,敏感性 = 84%,特异性 = 80%)相比,34名有发育风险状态的儿童(3名拒绝成像)的敏感性(89%)和特异性(100%)并未降低。
对有发育风险状态的幼儿进行屈光筛查的效果与正常儿童的结果相当。